Stress


Stress can be confusing since it can refer to a stimulus, response, a transaction. The stress response is multidimensional, there are multiple stress responses, and individuals often show a characteristic response pattern. The conceptualization of the stress response as nonspecific is misleading since clients may have unique stress triggers (time pressure) and specific psychophysiological changes (blood pressure spikes).

While early theories of stress emphasized the role of stimuli, more recent theories focus on our cognitive appraisal of events and coping resources. The biopsychosocial model has replaced the aging biomedical model due to its greater comprehensiveness and support for interdisciplinary treatment of disorders. Likewise, the allostatic load model has replaced Selye's General Adaptation System framework for understanding the role of stress in disease. Graphic © Arseniy Krasnevsky/Shutterstock.com.
 




Chronic stress reduces heart rate variability (HRV). "HRV is the organized fluctuation of time intervals between successive heartbeats defined as interbeat intervals" (Shaffer, Meehan, & Zerr, 2020). We measure the time intervals between successive heartbeats in milliseconds. Graphic courtesy of Dick Gevirtz.



HRV is crucial to health, performance, and resilience. Low HRV is a marker for cardiovascular disorders, including hypertension, especially with left ventricular hypertrophy; ventricular arrhythmia; chronic heart failure; and ischemic heart disease (Bigger et al., 1995; Casolo et al., 1989; Maver et al., 2004; Nolan et al., 1992; Roach et al., 2004). Low HRV predicts sudden cardiac death, particularly due to arrhythmia following myocardial infarction and post-heart attack survival (Bigger et al., 1993; Bigger et al., 1992; Kleiger et al., 1987).

Reduced HRV may predict disease and mortality because it indexes reduced regulatory capacity, which is the ability to surmount challenges like exercise and stressors. Patient age may be an essential link between reduced HRV and regulatory capacity since HRV and nervous system function decline with age (Shaffer, McCraty, & Zerr, 2014).

BCIA Blueprint Coverage


This unit complements the BCIA HRV Biofeedback Blueprint.
 

This unit covers Stressors and Stress, The Stress Response is Multidimensional, Biopsychosocial Model, Allostatic Load Model, Stress-Diathesis Model, System-Wide Effects of Stress, Stressful Life Events, Psychological Factors in Stress, Acute and Chronic Stress Responses, Psychoneuroimmunology, Cognitive Appraisal of Stressors and Coping, Personality Dimensions, and Resources to Buffer Stress.

Please click on the podcast icon below to hear a full-length lecture.



Stressors and Stress


Cannon (1939) studied how environmental stressors like cold temperatures and loss of oxygen trigger a fight-or-flight response. He conceptualized stress as the disruption of homeostasis when the body mobilizes the sympathetic and endocrine systems to deal with external threats.



Selye (1956) also studied environmental challenges to homeostasis. He referred to stress (and strain) as emotional and physiological responses to stimuli called stressors.




Listen to a mini-lecture on Stressors and Stress
© BioSource Software LLC.

Selye conceptualized stress as a nonspecific response.

Selye conceptualized these responses as nonspecific since many stimuli can produce the same physiological changes. He theorized that negative and positive stimuli could provoke stress responses requiring coping resources. He termed stress due to aversive stimuli, distress, and positive events, as eustress (Moksnes & Espnes, 2016).

btn


The Yerkes-Dodson curve graphs the relationship between stressors and performance. The left side of the inverted U-curve depicts an underload where an individual is insufficiently challenged and bored. This phenomenon of low motivation and performance has been termed rust out and reminds us that we require stressors for motivation and creativity (O'Dowd, 1987). The middle region that ends with peak performance corresponds to eustress. An optimal level of challenge promotes focus, motivation, and creativity. The right side of the curve represents the worsening effects of excessive pressure, overload, and burn-out with anxiety, panic, and anger. Graphic © Olivier Le Moal/Shutterstock.com.

Evaluation

Selye's model excluded psychological factors like appraisal. His assumption that stress involves nonspecific physiological changes is incorrect. All stressors do not produce a uniform endocrine stress response. Instead, stressors can change multiple body systems in response to stressor intensity, biological predisposition, cognitive appraisal, perceived support, and emotional response (Mason, 1971, 1975; McEwen, 2005; Taylor, 2021). Finally, whereas Selye proposed that our stress responses attempt to maintain physiological processes within a narrow optimal range, current research focuses on adaptation (e.g., allostatic load model) instead of set points (Brannon et al., 2022).



The Stress Response Is Multidimensional


The human stress response is multidimensional and involves diverse systems, from the central nervous system to the immune system. Each person uniquely responds to stressors. This individualized pattern is called response stereotypy. Individuals differ in the systems impacted, their activation or suppression, and how these changes affect health. While stressors can produce system-wide macroscopic changes like increased blood pressure, they can also cause epigenetic changes that alter DNA expression. Graphic © Sergey Nivens/Shutterstock.com.





Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Responders

Two modal patterns of autonomic response to stressors have been observed. A sympathetic responder may increase blood pressure, heart rate, and sweat gland activity and decrease heart rate variability and peripheral blood flow. These changes may result from increased sympathetic activation, decreased parasympathetic activation called parasympathetic withdrawal, or a combination of both.




Listen to a mini-lecture on Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Responders
© BioSource Software LLC.

In contrast, a parasympathetic responder may increase digestive activity, constrict the lungs' alveoli, and faint from low blood pressure.

Individuals can react to stressors with elements of both autonomic patterns. For example, they can increase heart rate and blood pressure (sympathetic) while experiencing the gastrointestinal symptoms of diarrhea and gas (parasympathetic).

btn


Hawks and Doves

Individuals differ in their behavioral activation when confronted by a stressor. While behavior is activated in the "fight-or-flight" response, it is suppressed in the "freeze-hide" response. The dazed young man illustrates passive parasympathetically-mediated freezing. Graphic © Dean Drobot/Shutterstock.com.




Evolutionary biologists have called active and passive responses "hawk" and "dove" strategies. Graphic © jimkruger/ iStockphoto.com.





Hawks are described as "proactive and bold," while doves are passive, reactive, nonaggressive, and cautious. Hawks appear to utilize the "fight-or-flight" response and activate the sympathetic-adrenomedullary (SAM) pathway. Doves, in contrast, activate the hypothalamic-pituitary (HPA) axis (Woolfolk et al., 2007).

Men and women may respond differently to stressors. Studies of hormonal secretion during sports competition (Kivlinghan et al., 2005) and children's reactions to threatening behavior by their mothers (David & Lyons-Ruth, 2005) support the hypothesis that men are more likely to flee while women prefer to affiliate. Graphic © lassedesignen/Shutterstock.com.




Stress-related disorders are more prevalent in women than men in the US (Gaidos, 2016).



Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone (CRH)

The stress hormone corticotropin-releasing hormone or factor (CRH/CRF) is a hormone and neurotransmitter. Threats and intense emotional responses cause the brain to secrete CRH to increase attention and mobilize to cope with a threat. The brain releases CRH at the prefrontal cortex (attention and executive functions), the amygdala (anxiety, fear, and emotional memories), and the hippocampus (declarative memories). The hormones estrogen and progesterone in females and testosterone in men may influence the brain's response to CRH.

Bangasser (2013) reported evidence from studies with rodents that males reduce the number of postsynaptic CRH receptors following a stressor while females do not. Female rodents' brains are more responsive to elevated CRH levels, and this prolonged response may result in hypervigilance. Chronic high levels of stress hormones can modify DNA via epigenetic mechanisms (like DNA methylation) to increase vulnerability to disorders like anxiety and depression (Gaidos, 2016).

Oxytocin

The medioventral bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (near the hypothalamus) regulates anxiety and teaches us to avoid stress-related locations or situations. When strangers bully female rodents, they increase the number of oxytocin-secreting neurons and oxytocin levels in the stria terminalis. Following stressful events, oxytocin may increase anxiety to a greater degree in female than male rodents. Women diagnosed with PTSD have elevated plasma levels of oxytocin (Gaidos, 2016).

Neurosecretory cells in the hypothalamus synthesize oxytocin released by terminals located in the posterior pituitary (Breedlove & Watson, 2020). Graphic © Designua/Shutterstock.com.

Biopsychosocial Model


Engel's (1977, 1980) biopsychosocial model proposes that the complex interplay of psychological, biological, and sociological factors results in health or illness.



In this model, stress is a psychological risk factor that affects and is influenced by an individual's biology and sociology. The biopsychosocial model challenges the biomedical model that illness is primarily due to biological abnormalities, which has influenced medical practice since the 1700s (Taylor, 2012). A clinician who adopts the biopsychosocial model assumes that health depends on all three factors. When treating illness, these factors must be assessed and addressed using an interdisciplinary approach (Schwartz, 1982).

The illustration below was adapted from Brannon et al. (2022).



Evidence supporting the biopsychosocial model includes increased psychological and medical disorders in divorced and bereaved persons (Schneider, 1984).

Allostatic Load Model


Allostasis, which means achieving stability through change, involves matching type (sympathetic or parasympathetic) and intensity of physiological activation to situational demands (Brannon et al., 2022).

McEwen and Seeman's (1999) allostatic load model proposes that biological responses to stress (e.g., cortisol secretion or elevated glutamate transmission) can harm the body when stressors are acute or repeatedly occur. Over time, the stress response itself may overwhelm the body's adaptive capacity.


Caption: Bruce McEwen

btn


Allostatic load can produce growing changes during childhood, increasing health risks across the life cycle (Wiley et al., 2016). It can prematurely age the body. Chronic stress may suppress cell-mediated immunity, reduce hippocampal control of cortisol during stress, lower heart rate variability (HRV), raise plasma epinephrine, increase the waist-to-hip ratio, reduce hippocampal volume, impair cognitive performance (e.g., memory), increase plasma fibrinogen, raise blood pressure, and increase the risk of illness and death (Juster et al., 2010; Karlamangla et al., 2006; McEwen & Gianaros, 2010). Table adapted from Seeman et al. (1997) and Taylor (2021).



Researchers have linked high allostatic load to illness in children and the elderly (Johnston-Brooks et al., 1998; Seeman et al., 1997). The damage produced by allostatic load can be amplified by decreased healthy behaviors (e.g., exercise) and increased unhealthy behaviors (e.g., binge drinking and smoking) (Ng & Jefferey, 2003).



Check out Sapolsky's superb National Geographic YouTube video Stress, Portrait of a Killer.

Stress-Diathesis Model


The stress-diathesis model explains that stressors interact with our inherited or acquired biological vulnerabilities, diatheses, to produce medical and psychological symptoms. From this perspective, disease results when an individual is predisposed to disease and experiences stress. Life event scales like the SRRS and USQ may achieve low predictive validity because they only and incompletely assess stress; they do not evaluate illness vulnerability (Marsland et al., 2001).

The interrelationship between stress, insomnia, and depression illustrates the stress-diathesis model. Sleep reactivity, the tendency for sleep to be disrupted by stress, appears to be a shared vulnerability in insomnia and depression. Greater sleep reactivity produces insomnia, and insomnia contributes to depression. Chronic insomnia can also increase blood pressure, blood sugar levels, and weight (Drake et al., 2014).

System-Wide Effects of Stress

Stress and the Microbiome

The human microbiome encompasses the collective genomes of trillions of microorganisms residing in and on the human body, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa. The ratio of human cells to microbiota, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses, is approximately 1:1. This challenges the previously held belief that microbes outnumber human cells by a ratio of 10:1 (Sender, Fuchs, & Milo, 2016).

These microbial communities inhabit various niches such as the skin, oral cavity, gastrointestinal tract, and urogenital regions, playing crucial roles in maintaining health by aiding digestion, modulating the immune system, and protecting against pathogens. Graphic © Kateryna Kon/Shutterstock.com.




Researchers have proposed distinct blood, brain, and vaginal microbiomes.

Blood Microbiome

Traditionally, blood has been considered a sterile environment. However, recent studies suggest the presence of a low-biomass microbiome in the bloodstream, potentially originating from translocated gut microbes or oral pathogens. The composition and implications of this blood microbiome are still under investigation, with some research indicating associations with systemic diseases.

Brain Microbiome

The central nervous system (CNS) has long been regarded as a sterile site due to the protective blood-brain barrier. Emerging research proposes that microbial components or metabolites may influence CNS function indirectly through systemic circulation or the vagus nerve, rather than a resident brain microbiome. The concept of a direct brain microbiome remains controversial and is an active area of research.

Vaginal Microbiome

The vaginal microbiome is predominantly composed of Lactobacillus species, which maintain an acidic environment (pH 3.5-4.5) that inhibits pathogenic organisms. Disruptions in this microbiome can lead to conditions such as bacterial vaginosis, characterized by a decrease in Lactobacillus and an increase in anaerobic bacteria, potentially increasing susceptibility to infections and adverse reproductive outcomes.





The Microbiome Modulates Neurotransmitters

The gut microbiota communicates with the brain through the microbiota-gut-brain axis, influencing neurotransmitter production, transportation, and function, which in turn affects cognitive functions and brain activity (Chen, Xu, & Chen, 2021; Lynch & Hsiao, 2023).

Key neurotransmitters such as dopamine, serotonin, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) are modulated by gut bacteria, which can produce or alter these neuroactive compounds, impacting host physiology and potentially contributing to conditions like Parkinson's disease, anxiety, and depression (Foster & Neufeld, 2013; Hamamah et al., 2022; Strandwitz, 2022).

The microbiome's ability to produce neurotransmitters and interact with host receptors underscores its potential as a therapeutic target, with emerging research focusing on psychobiotics—probiotics and prebiotics that influence mental health (LaGreca, Skehan, & Hutchinson, 2022).

Additionally, microbial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids and bile acids play a role in signaling pathways that affect brain function and behavior (Caspani & Swann, 2019; Foster, 2022).

The Gut-Brain Axis and Disease

The gut-brain axis refers to the bidirectional communication network linking the gastrointestinal tract and the central nervous system, encompassing neural, hormonal, and immunological pathways. The gut microbiota significantly influences this axis by producing neurotransmitters (e.g., serotonin, gamma-aminobutyric acid) and metabolites like short-chain fatty acids, which can affect brain function and behavior. Gut-brain axis graphic © Axel_Kock/Shutterstock.com.





Alterations in gut microbiota composition, known as dysbiosis, have been associated with various neurological and psychiatric disorders, including depression, anxiety, and autism spectrum disorders. For instance, studies have demonstrated that germ-free mice exhibit altered stress responses and anxiety-like behaviors, which can be mitigated by introducing specific microbial species, highlighting the microbiota's role in modulating the gut-brain axis (Schächtle & Rosshart, 2021).

Furthermore, systemic inflammation resulting from gut dysbiosis may compromise the integrity of the blood-brain barrier, facilitating the entry of neurotoxic substances and contributing to neuroinflammation. This mechanism has been implicated in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease.


How Stress Affects the Microbiome

Stress, whether psychological, environmental, or physical, can significantly alter the composition and function of gut microbiota, which in turn affects the host's stress response and overall health (Karl et al., 2018).

The gut-brain axis, a complex communication network involving the gut microbiota, plays a crucial role in regulating stress-related responses, with diet being a significant modifying factor (Foster, Rinaman, & Cryan, 2017).

Stress-induced changes in the gut microbiota can lead to immune system activation and inflammation, which are linked to various stress-related conditions such as anxiety, depression, and irritable bowel syndrome (Buerel, 2024).

Moreover, early life stress has been shown to impact the gut microbiome, although consistent microbiome signatures associated with stress are yet to be identified (Agustí et al., 2023).

Chronic stress can exacerbate conditions like inflammatory bowel disease by disturbing the gut microbiota and triggering immune responses (Gao et al., 2018).


Protein Kinase C

Birnbaum and colleagues (2004) reported that uncontrollable stressful situations activate the enzyme protein kinase C (PKC), interfering with prefrontal cortical functions like working memory. Elevated PKC levels may result in symptoms of distractibility, impulsiveness, and poor judgment seen in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Initial psychotic episodes often follow stressors like leaving home for college or the military. Very low levels of lead exposure can elevate PKC levels in children, possibly impairing their regulation of behavior and producing distractibility and impulsivity.


Stress Accelerates Aging

Epel and colleagues (2004) studied 58 healthy women who cared for either healthy or chronically ill children. The researchers administered a brief questionnaire that assessed chronic stress during the previous month and obtained a blood sample to measure telomere (DNA and protein that cover the ends of chromosomes), length, and levels of telomerase (an enzyme that adds DNA to telomeres). Graphic © Designua/Shutterstock.com.




With repeated cell division, telomere DNA is lost, the telomere shortens, and eventually, cell division stops. When cells age, telomerase activity declines, and the telomere shortens. Graphic © koya979/ Shutterstock.com.






The researchers found that the mothers of chronically ill children reported higher chronic stress levels than mothers of healthy children. More years of caring for chronically ill children were correlated with shorter telomeres and lower telomerase levels. Perceived levels of chronic stress—and not a child's actual health status—predicted telomere length. The researchers calculated that the cells of high-stress mothers had aged 9 to 17 more years than those of the low-stress mothers.

Stress May Contribute to Mild Cognitive Impairment

Older adults enrolled in the Einstein Aging Study who reported high stress levels were twice as likely to exhibit the memory deficits associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which may precede Alzheimer's (Katz et al., 2015).

Stressful Life Events

Cataclysmic Events

Lazarus and Cohen (1977) described cataclysmic events as "sudden, unique, and powerful single life-events requiring major adaptive responses from population groups sharing the experience” (p. 91).

Intentional and unintentional, these events can impact local communities (e.g., mass shootings), geographic regions (e.g., earthquakes, fires, hurricanes, and tsunamis), and the entire planet (e.g., the COVID-19 pandemic. These catastrophes can produce death, dislocation, fear, grief, trauma, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Graphic © Syda Productions/Shutterstock.com.




Many factors influence survivor response to these powerful stressful events, including perceived discrimination, resources, support, vulnerability to future harm, distance from the devastation, and media coverage. The stressfulness of an event is influenced by geographic proximity, its recency, and whether it was intended. Intentional events are more traumatic than natural disasters because the perpetrators targeted the victims and could do so again (Brannon et al., 2022).


Life Events

Cataclysmic events like a pandemic are so disruptive become they change our lives in various ways: education, employment, exercise, personal, family member, and friend illness, routines, sleep, social interaction, and working conditions.

Life events differ from cataclysmic events in three ways. They affect fewer individuals. They require adjustment, whether positive (e.g., the birth of a child) or negative (e.g., the death of a loved one). Last, they can develop more slowly (e.g., divorce) or suddenly (e.g., injury in a car crash).

Holmes and Rahe (1967) measured major positive and negative life changes using their Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS). The scale lists 43 events, each assigned a different Life Change Unit (LCU) value. They arranged these events in descending order from the death of a spouse (100 LCUs) to minor law violations (11 LCUs). Individuals select the events they have experienced within the last 6 to 24 months. Researchers calculate a stress score by summing the LCU value of the checked events.

Studies that combine prospective (subjects report current events) and retrospective methods (researchers examine subsequent health records) have reported increased illness and accidents following increased stressful events (Johnson, 1986; Rahe & Arthur, 1978). However, the correlation between SRRS scores and disease is around + 0.30 (Dohrenwend & Dohrenwend, 1984), which means that the SRRS accounts for only 9% of the variance in disease.




Listen to a mini-lecture on the Effects of Major Life Changes and Hassles
© BioSource Software LLC.

The SRRS has received severe criticism, and its popularity has declined. Critics have argued that its positive events can reduce the risk of illness (Ray, Jefferies, & Weir, 1995). Many individuals who exceed 300 points in a year remain healthy. Scales like the SRRS underestimate African-American life stress (Turner & Avison, 2003). The SRRS assumes that an event impacts all people equally. The wording of some items is vague (e.g., "change in responsibilities at work"). Pessimism can distort recollections of life events (Brett et al., 1990). Finally, the scale does not consider whether an event has been resolved (Turner & Avison, 1992) or an event's controllability or probability (Gump & Matthews, 2000).

btn
The Undergraduate Stress Questionnaire (USQ) developed by Crandall and colleagues (1992) instructs students to select events—mostly hassles—they have experienced during the past two weeks. Higher USQ scores are associated with increased use of health services.

The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) developed by Cohen and colleagues (1983) measures perceived hassles, major life changes, and shifts in coping resources during the previous month using a 14-item scale. PSS items assess the degree to which respondents rate their lives as unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded (p. 387). The PSS achieves good reliability and validity (Brannon, Feist, & Updegraff, 2022). PSS scores predict cortisol levels (Harrell et al., 1996), fatigue, headache, sore throat (Lacey et al., 2000), and immune changes (Maes et al., 1997).


Hassles and Uplifts

A hassle is a minor stressful event like waiting in a checkout line or experiencing a traffic jam. Hassles can produce illness via several pathways. First, hassles can cause accumulating allostatic load. Second, hassles can amplify the effects of adverse life events and chronic stress (Marin et al., 2007; Serido et al., 2004; Taylor, 2021). Graphic © Dmitry Kalinvosky/Shutterstock.com.




 
btn
Graig's (1993) concept of urban press illustrates how ever-present environmental stressors (e.g., alienation, crowding, fear of crime, noise, and pollution) acting in concert as daily hassles can increase death from heart attacks (Christenfeld et al., 1999). As with stressors in general, an individual's perception of daily hassles like noise and population density determines their effects on behavior, health, and performance (Brannon et al., 2022; Evans & Stecker, 2004; Schell & Denham, 2003). For example, crowding is our perception of density, influenced by our perceived degree of control. Graphic © Wachiwit/Shutterstock.com.





Discrimination experienced in the classroom, community, family, media, and workplace is another source of daily hassles. Discrimination based on age, biological sex, ethnicity, gender identity, and religion can disadvantage and physically endanger individuals and threaten their mental and physical health (Brannon et al., 2022; Pascoe & Richman, 2009; Troxel et al., 2003). Discrimination has elevated the risk of suicide in the bisexual, gay, lesbian, and transgender communities (Haas et al., 2011). Further, Anti-Asian hate has resulted in a wave of attacks against Asian Americans. Graphic © CNN.




The framework of intersectionality proposes that social identities (e.g., biological sex, class, gender identity, and race) interact to produce discrimination, disadvantage, or advantage. For example, a white woman with a disability may encounter sexism and ableism, while a Black transgender woman with the same disability may experience discrimination and transphobia. Their lived experiences will differ because their unique identities intersect, creating different patterns of discrimination and access barriers (Surrey Place-Staff, 2021). Graphic courtesy of Womankind Worldwide.



An uplift is a minor positive event like receiving an unexpected call from a friend or playing with new puppies. Graphic © Orientgold/Shutterstock.com.



Kanner and colleagues (1981) developed a 117-item Hassles Scale, and 138-item Uplifts Scale to measure negative and positive daily experiences. Respondents selected the hassles and uplifts they experienced during the previous month. Next, they rated the degree to which they experienced each selected item on a 3-point scale to assess their perception of each stressor. They found a moderate correlation between hassles and major life changes. Lazarus (1984) reported that the Hassles Scale better predicted psychological health than major life changes.

DeLongis and colleagues (1988) replaced the Hassles and Uplifts Scales with a 53-item revised Hassles and Uplifts Scale. Respondents selected the items they experienced that day and rated each item using a 4-point scale (none to a great deal). The revised Hassles Scale better predicted headache frequency and intensity (Fernandez & Sheffield, 1996) and inflammatory bowel disease frequency (Searle & Bennett, 2001) than the Social Readjustment Rating Scale. Consistent with Lazarus's emphasis on the appraisal of events, the perceived intensity of hassles better predicted headache symptoms than the number of hassles.

The interaction between hassles and chronic stress is complex. Hassles may increase the psychological distress produced by chronic stress (Serido et al., 2004). Conversely, chronic stress may reduce the effects of hassles by placing them in perspective (McGonagle & Kessler, 1990).

Hardiness

Some individuals do not experience illness or psychological distress when exposed to adverse life events and hassles. Although they may experience brief distress, they generally recover (Lehrer, 2021). Researchers use the concept of hardiness to explain these outliers (Maddi, 2017; Maddi et al., 2017; Pitts et al., 2016; Stoppelbein et al., 2017). Graphic ©lassedesignen/Shutterstock.com.



btn


The hardiness concept emerged from a 12-year study of manager stress responses at the Illinois Bell Company (Maddi, 1987). Halfway through the study, their parent company's reorganization eliminated half their employees within a year. Two-thirds of the managers experienced severe stress reactions (e.g., heart attacks, depression, and suicide), and one-third thrived. The investigators concluded that the hardy managers were protected by attitudes of commitment (strong involvement), control (internal locus of control), and challenge (learning from experience and accepting change).

Hardiness involves biological (McVicar et al., 2014; Oken et al., 2015; Parkash et al., 2017) and social factors (Kuzman & Konopak, 2016; Zeer et al., 2016). Longitudinal studies suggest that infants' autonomic and emotional reactivity predicts later emotional reactivity (Berry et al., 2012; Cohen, 1989; Raby, 2016; Wagner et al., 2017). Less reactive infants may become more resilient. In addition, cohesiveness and social support (actual and perceived) may buffer hardy individuals against stressors. Graphic © Nina Buday/Shutterstock.com.

Psychological Factors in Stress

Traumatic Stress and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

Traumatic stress is produced by a highly intense stressor that disrupts coping and endangers ourselves or others. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a severe and long-lasting trauma and stressor-related disorder that often develops within three months of a traumatic event. DSM-5 (APA, 2013) divides its symptoms into four clusters: intrusion, avoidance, negative alterations in cognitions and mood, and alterations in arousal and reactivity. Graphic © John Gomez/Shutterstock.com.




The exposure can also be second-hand, such as witnessing domestic violence or learning about a family tragedy (Crider, 2004; Lamprecht & Sack, 2002). The lifetime prevalence of adult PTSD in the United States is about 6.8% (Kessler et al., 2005).

While the earliest model of PTSD focused on trauma during combat, subsequent research has shown that crime, domestic violence, natural disasters, sexual assault, and terrorism can precipitate PTSD symptoms. Since women are more likely than men to experience these stressful events, it should not be surprising that they are more often diagnosed with this disorder (Stein et al., 2000). Children and adolescent victims and witnesses of violence also share an elevated risk of PTSD (Silva et al., 2000).

btn
A single traumatic event can reshape synapses and increase electrical activity in the amygdala 10 days later. The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA-R) protein, which plays a central role in long-term memory, mediates these changes (Yasmin et al., 2016). Amygdala graphic © Kateryna Kon/ Shutterstock.com.





Children with depression experience trauma (35 percent) and bullying (29 percent) (Advokat, Comaty, & Julien, 2014). Graphic © fasphotographic/Shutterstock.com.





Intentional acts may produce more widespread distress than natural disasters because they threaten future and more devastating attacks. The impact of a catastrophic event depends on your distance from the event, the time interval since the event, and the perpetrators' perceived intentions (Brannon et al., 2022).

PTSD can permanently damage the systems that regulate our stress response, particularly the amygdala and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Patients experience increased cortisol level fluctuation and persistent epinephrine, norepinephrine, testosterone, and thyroxin elevation (Taylor, 2006).

PTSD may promote medical illness through persistent immunosuppression (Kawamura et al., 2001). Military veterans diagnosed with PTSD have a greater risk of developing severe diseases following discharge than veterans without PTSD (Deykin et al., 2001). PTSD may also exacerbate pre-existing health problems. PTSD resulting from the September 11, 2001, World Trade Center attacks may have helped worsen asthmatic symptoms in New York residents (Fagan et al., 2003).


Negative Affect States and Affectivity

From a mindfulness perspective, we should not consider emotional responses like depression as negative but as difficult emotions. A clinician would encourage clients to accept depressed feelings as part of themselves without judgment and to focus on specific behaviors that can be changed (Khazan, 2013).

Stressors can trigger complex adjustments, including challenging affective states (anxiety) and corresponding psychophysiological changes (decreased HRV). Barrett and Russell's (1998) structural model represents each affective state within a circumplex based on its degrees of affective valence (unpleasant to pleasant) and affective intensity (activation to deactivation). Affective states fall inside or along the surface of this circular structure. Diagram adapted from Russell and Barrett (1999).


Barrett and Russell

btn


Negative states (sad) are located in the left hemisphere and positive states (contented) are located in the right hemisphere. Activated states (tense) are placed in the top hemisphere, and deactivated states (fatigued) are placed in the bottom hemisphere. While adjacent affective states (stressed and nervous) most resemble each other, those 180° apart (stressed and relaxed) are opposites. After clinicians identify their clients' position within the circumplex, they may intervene to shift them to a more appropriate affective state, like relaxed instead of nervous.

Researchers have reported psychophysiological correlates of the affective valence and activation dimensions. Surface EMG (SEMG) and EEG can help assess affective valence. SEMG measurements of the zygomatic (smiling) and corrugator (frowning) muscles are correlated with positive and negative affect (Lang et al., 1993). Higher left/right prefrontal cortex activation ratios are correlated with positive affect, while reverse ratios are correlated with negative affect (Sutton & Davidson, 1997). Sympathetic nervous system modalities like electrodermal activity are associated with affective intensity (Crider, 2004; Lang et al., 1993).

Negative affectivity (neuroticism) is a predisposition toward distress and dissatisfaction. Individuals rated high on this trait negatively perceive themselves, others, and the environment and have a pessimistic perspective. They rank more events as stressful, report more intense stress, complain more frequently about health problems, and report more severe symptoms when physically ill than those with lower negative affectivity (Cohen et al., 1995; Gunthert et al., 1999). Negative affectivity may increase vulnerability to stressors and health conditions like anxiety and depressive disorders they exacerbate (Brannon et al., 2022).

The Type D (distressed) personality combines high negative affectivity and social inhibition levels. Individuals rated high on this dimension cannot communicate their distress with others. Researchers have studied the relationship between negative emotionality and social inhibition and the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Negative emotionality is positively correlated with Neuroticism, whereas social inhibition is negatively correlated with Conscientiousness and Agreeableness (De Fruyt & Denollet, 2002). Five-Factor Model of Personality adapted from Sarafino et al. (2020).



The Type D personality better predicted the buildup of arterial plaque than the Type A behavior pattern (Lin et al., 2018). However, although initial studies suggested that Type-D coronary artery disease patients have poorer prognoses, later studies (Bishop, 2016; Meyer et al., 2014) have not consistently supported this association.

Anxiety

A Framingham study report by Markovitz et al. (1993) showed that men with elevated anxiety had twice the risk of middle-age hypertension as men with lower anxiety. This increased risk was not found for women. A prospective study by Kawachi et al. (1994) revealed that men diagnosed with phobic anxiety had a three times greater risk of sudden cardiac death. Albert et al. (2005) found that women diagnosed with phobic anxiety had a 59% greater risk of sudden cardiac death and a 31% greater risk of fatal coronary heart disease than women who scored low. These increased risks were associated with risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, and high cholesterol. Graphic © Malochka Mikalai/ Shutterstock.com.




Depression

Pratt et al. (1996) reported that depressed individuals had a four times greater risk of a heart attack in the next 14 years than non-depressed individuals. Frasure-Smith et al. (1995) found that depressed heart attack patients had a four times greater risk of another heart attack in the next 18 months than non-depressed heart attack patients. Carney et al. (2005) discovered that depressed heart attack patients were almost three times more likely to die over 30 months than non-depressed heart patients. Decreased heart rate variability accounted for a significant share of the increased risk of death.

btn


Jonas and Mussolino (2000) found in a 16-year longitudinal study that participants diagnosed with depression had a 70% greater risk of stroke mediated by ethnicity. Stroke risk was higher for depressed European American men than women and depressed African Americans than European Americans. Everson et al. (1998) reported that depressed individuals had a greater risk of death from stroke than nondepressed participants. Graphic © MeganAlter/Shutterstock.com.




Type A-B Continuum

Friedman and Rosenman (1974) proposed the Type A-B continuum of risk for coronary artery disease. They described extreme Type A’s as competitive, concerned with numbers and acquisition, hostile, and time-pressured. In contrast, Type B's are less motivated and do not usually exhibit Type A behaviors. Their study of 3,000 men over 8.5 years showed that Type A behavior doubled the risk of a heart attack. The National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (1981) concluded that Type A behavior is an independent risk for heart disease.

Despite early hopes that the global Type A behavior pattern could independently predict heart disease, current research has not consistently supported this association (Brannon et al., 2022; Espnes & Byrne, 2016).

Hostility

Hostility is a negative attitude about others, not an emotion. Hostility is the toxic component of the Type A behavior pattern. In contrast, anger is a difficult emotion associated with physiological arousal. Longitudinal studies suggest a modest predictive relationship between hostility, hypertension (Yan et al., 2003), and cardiovascular disease (CVD; Chida & Steptoe, 2009).


Anger and Cardiovascular Reactivity

Hostility is a negative attitude towards individuals—not an emotion—and may persist for long. Taylor (2012) proposed that cardiovascular reactivity (changes in cardiovascular function due to physical or psychological challenge) and hostility in conflict situations might promote heart disease. The disease pathways may involve changes in blood vessels and catecholamine levels, sympathetic nervous system release of lipids into circulating blood, and blood platelet activation.

Anger is a difficult emotion that involves physiological arousal and persists for a brief period. Siegman and colleagues (1987) proposed that the expression of anger—and not our experience of it—could result in heart disease. Examples of expressed anger include raising your voice during arguments and temper tantrums (Brannon et al., 2022). Graphic © Oliyy/Shutterstock.com.




btn


Jain and colleagues (1995) monitored patients using an electronic stethoscope. When patients were angry, the researchers observed declines in the heart's ejection fraction (the ratio of blood pumped by the left ventricle during a contraction compared to its total filling volume). Bhat and Bhat (1999) demonstrated that an intervention to manage anger using biofeedback significantly increased their patients' ejection fraction.

Expressed anger may contribute to heart disease by increasing cardiovascular reactivity (CVR), often revealed as increased blood pressure and heart rate in response to social stressors like a provocation.

Dujovne and Houston (1991) linked expressed hostility with increased total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in men and women. Goldman (1996) reported that individuals classified with high anger had a 2.5 times greater chance of re-clogging arteries after angioplasty. Siegman and colleagues (1992) found that training to slow speech rate and lower speech volume reduced CVR.

Researchers have shown that provocation can increase cardiovascular reactivity.

Smith and Brown (1991) found that when provoked, women showed less CVR than men. While husbands increased their heart rate and systolic blood pressure while trying to control their wives, they did not experience these changes when trying to control their husbands. The wives' systolic blood pressure only increased when their husbands expressed cynical hostility.

After provoking male undergraduates, Siegman, Anderson, Herbst, Boyle, and Wilkinson (1992) observed increased heart rate and blood pressure (diastolic and systolic). The subjects reported experiencing considerable anger following their provocation.

Fredrickson et al. (2000) asked adult men and women to re-experience earlier anger experiences. More hostile participants produced larger and longer-duration blood pressure increases than less hostile individuals. Also, African Americans showed greater CVR than European Americans.

Bishop and Robinson (2000) studied Chinese and Indian men in Singapore who performed a difficult task either with or without harassment. The harassed participants showed greater CVR than those who were not provoked.

Smith et al. (2004) reported that high-hostile husbands experienced greater cardiovascular reactivity during stressful interactions with their wives than low-hostile husbands.


Suppressed Anger

Diamond (1982) hypothesized an anger-in dimension, which is the tendency to withhold the expression of anger, even when anger is warranted. Dembroski and colleagues (1985) reported that anger suppression could contribute to heart disease. Siegman (1994) recommended that patients develop an awareness of their anger but express it using a quiet, slow voice.

Acute and Chronic Stress Responses


Acute Stress

Cannon's fight-or-flight response focuses on sympathetic nervous system responses to an acute stressor and describes the sympathetic-adrenomedullary (SAM) pathway that releases the hormones epinephrine and norepinephrine. Selye's General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS) describes our prolonged response to a chronic stressor across three stages. The GAS summarizes changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, which releases the hormones CRH, ACTH, and cortisol, and explains how chronic stress can produce disease and death.




The Fight-or-Flight Response

Cannon (1932) described the fight-or-flight response, in which an individual confronts or flees a stressor. During an acute stress response, which corresponds to the end of Selye's alarm stage, we activate the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), increasing respiration, cardiac output, blood flow to skeletal muscles, and metabolism while decreasing digestion and the reproductive system activity. The SNS, in turn, activates the hard-wired sympathetic-adrenomedullary (SAM) pathway, resulting in the release of the hormones epinephrine and norepinephrine by the adrenal medulla (inner adrenal gland).




Listen to a mini-lecture on the SAM Pathway
© BioSource Software LLC. The acute stress response is illustrated © Designua/Shutterstock.com.








The adrenal medulla releases epinephrine and norepinephrine in a 4:1 ratio (Fox, 2019). The adrenal medulla is the inner region of the adrenal glands located at the top of each kidney. Graphic © Designua/Shutterstock.com.



btn


The catecholamines epinephrine and norepinephrine mobilize blood glucose and fatty acids to provide energy for skeletal muscle contraction. They increase blood flow to the muscles by increasing cardiac output and blood pressure. They dilate coronary blood vessels and the bronchioles of the lungs and increase respiratory rate. Increased delivery of oxygen to the brain heightens alertness. As part of fight or flight, they increase metabolic rate, activate fibrinogen to accelerate clotting, constrict skin blood vessels to reduce blood loss, and release endorphins to suppress pain (McEwen, 2002). Epinephrine levels are higher when we are fearful, and norepinephrine levels are higher when angry (Ward et al., 1983).

SAM activation is adaptive when its intensity and duration enable us to cope with an external threat. Low SAM activation facilitates athletic and cognitive performance, while intense SAM activation allows us to overcome physical threats. However, intense SAM activation is maladaptive in panic attacks or anticipatory anxiety, where there is neither an external threat nor active coping. 

Intense SAM activation can threaten health and produce medical complaints.




Listen to a mini-lecture on the Effects of Intense SAM Activation
© BioSource Software.

Anger can constrict coronary arteries, reduce cardiac output in cardiac patients (Committee on Health and Behavior, 2001), and are a risk factor for heart attacks and sudden cardiac death (Williams et al., 2000). Anxiety and acute grief, which can also produce intense SAM activation, are risk factors for sudden cardiac death (Engel, 1971; Kawachi et al., 1994). SAM activation also underlies common symptoms of chest pain, dizziness, and shortness of breath that can be confused with coronary insufficiency (Crider, 2004).

While Cannon emphasized sympathetic activation, stressors can also suppress parasympathetic activation and reduce HRV, consisting of changes in the time intervals between consecutive heartbeats (Task Force, 1996). Reduced parasympathetic tone can decrease restorative stage 3 sleep, contribute to illness, and increase mortality (Hall et al., 2004).


The Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis

The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is the second stage of the body's defense. The HPA axis is the foundation of allostasis and its failure, allostatic overload (McEwen, 2002). The HPA axis releases the hormones CRH, ACTH (corticotropin), and cortisol. This cascade starts with signals from the amygdala to the hypothalamus and ultimately targets the adrenal glands located at the top of each kidney.




Listen to a mini-lecture on the HPA Axis
© BioSource Software.

The adrenal cortex, the adrenal gland's outer region, produces the hormones aldosterone and cortisol. Cortisol is the most important glucocorticoid. Cortisol levels peak from 20-40 minutes following a stressor (Brannon et al., 2022).

btn


This pathway is regulated by negative feedback as rising cortisol levels inhibit hormone secretion by the hypothalamus and anterior pituitary. Graphic © Designua/Shutterstock.com.
Sustained elevated cortisol levels can affect mood and produce system-wide damage. Graphic © medicalstocks/Shutterstock.com.




CRH

In response to stressful stimuli, the amygdala's central nucleus activates the hypothalamus' paraventricular nucleus (PVN), resulting in increased CRH release to the pituitary gland.

Chronic, elevated CRH levels in the bloodstream may enhance learning classically conditioned fear responses, heighten arousal and attention to increase readiness to respond to a stressor, intensify the startle response, and reduce appetite and body weight, sexual behavior, and growth.

ACTH

When CRH binds to the pituitary gland, it releases corticotropin (ACTH). ACTH triggers cortisol release by the adrenal cortex (outer part) and helps resist infection.

Cortisol

Cortisol exerts widespread effects on critical body organs (Kemeny, 2003) and cortisol levels in the blood index stress, peaking 20 to 40 minutes following a stressor (Brannon et al., 2022).




Listen to a mini-lecture on Cortisol © BioSource Software LLC.

Cortisol increases our activity and appetite. It helps convert fat and protein to glucose. Cortisol has short-term and long-term effects on immunity. At first, cortisol directs white blood cells to sites of infection or wounds, increases their stickiness and adherence to blood vessels and damaged tissue, and communicates when immune activity is sufficient. Cortisol's long-term effect, however, is impaired immune function (McEwen, 2002).

In healthy individuals, cortisol levels are highest in the early morning, when they help wake us up and are lowest at night. In severely depressed individuals, the cortisol rhythm is suppressed, and its levels remain moderately high over 24 hours. Chronically elevated cortisol levels in the bloodstream adversely affect many organs, including the brain.

Allostatic load can result in hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar), insulin insensitivity (prevents insulin from transporting glucose into skeletal muscles), increased gastric acid secretion, and ulcers. Muscle protein is converted to fat. Fat storage in the abdomen increases, which endangers health more than storage in the hips and thighs. Bone mass is reduced due to the loss of minerals (McEwen, 2002).

Cortisol release can affect gene transcription, thus producing long-term and immediate effects on the body and setting the stage for several physical and psychological disorders (panic, PTSD, and somatization).

While we've seen how allostatic load can result in chronically elevated HPA axis release of cortisol, the opposite pattern, underproduction of cortisol, also occurs. Cortisol suppresses the immune system, which reduces inflammation and swelling, and moderates chronic pain. Low cortisol levels can result in allergies, asthma, autoimmune disorders like rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis, and chronic pain syndromes like fibromyalgia (McEwen, 2002).





Cortisol binding to the amygdala increases CRH and ACTH. Cortisol release amplifies the fear response, increases our ability to store implicit memories about stressful stimuli, and increases the amygdala’s ability to escape the prefrontal cortex’s regulation of emotional behavior.

Cortisol binding to the hippocampal formation disrupts the medial temporal lobe memory system’s creation of explicit (conscious) memories. Cortisol interferes with hippocampal regulation of the PVN of the hypothalamus. Chronically elevated cortisol levels harm and kill hippocampal neurons. Cortisol suppresses neuronal repair by BDNF and interferes with creating new neurons. The elderly are more vulnerable to cortisol's harmful effects because they more slowly shut down their stress response. Their cortisol negative feedback loop functions less efficiently than in younger individuals (McEwen, 2002).

Two pathways from the raphe system terminate in the hippocampus: an anxiogenic anxiety-producing pathway, and an anxiolytic, or anxiety-reducing pathway. Elevated cortisol levels suppress the anxiolytic pathway and facilitate the anxiogenic pathway. These changes heighten anxiety in a chronically stressed individual.

Cortisol binding to the dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex injures and kills neurons as in the hippocampus. Cortisol disrupts executive functions like attention and decision-making, increasing anxiety and fear.





Men and Women Respond Differently to Stressors

Taylor and colleagues argue that men's and women's behavioral and neuroendocrine responses to stressors differ, largely because of oxytocin. The posterior pituitary releases oxytocin when we encounter stressors. Researchers have associated oxytocin, which is affected by estrogen, with social bonding.

Although they share the same nervous system reactions to stressors, men tend to react with fight-or-flight while women respond with tend-and-befriend. Taylor and colleagues (2000) theorize that a tend-and-befriend response is an alternative reaction to stressors. They believe tending, nurturing behavior, and befriending, seeking, and providing social support may characterize women better. The tend-and-befriend response may protect their safety and the lives of their offspring.

Their higher oxytocin levels cause women to seek and provide greater support when distressed than men (Bodenmann et al., 2015; Tamres et al., 2002; Taylor et al., 2000). Supporting this view, women reporting relationship stress have higher blood oxytocin levels (Taylor et al., 2006; Taylor, Saphire-Bernstein, & Seeman, 2010). An interaction may mediate this response between oxytocin and estrogen and endogenous opioids. Graphic © YAKOBCHUK VIACHESLAV/Shutterstock.com.

Chronic Stress

General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS)

The General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS) was Selye’s (1956) three-stage model of chronic autonomic and endocrine system responses to stressors.




Listen to a mini-lecture on the General Adaptation Syndrome © BioSource Software LLC.


Selye argued that diverse stressors produce a three-stage response (alarm, resistance, and exhaustion) in all subjects. In this model, a cold stressor is interchangeable with a shock stressor because they produce the same autonomic and endocrine responses. Whereas Cannon showed that acute stress could change the functions of our internal organs, Selye mainly demonstrated using animal models that chronic stress can change their structure (Crider, 2004).

Alarm is the first stage of Selye’s GAS and consists of shock and countershock phases. The shock phase includes reduced body stress resistance and increased autonomic arousal and hormone release (ACTH, cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine) that comprise the fight-or-flight response. In the countershock phase, resistance increases due to local defenses.

Resistance is the second stage of Selye’s General Adaptation Syndrome. Local defenses have made the generalized stress response unnecessary. Both cortisol output and stress symptoms, like adrenal gland enlargement, decline. While the person appears normal, adaptation to the stressor places mounting demands on the body, leading to diseases of adaptation like hypertension as adaptation energy is depleted. Local defenses will break down if stressors persist. McEwen calls these adjustments allostatic load.

Recovery or Exhaustion is the third stage of Selye’s General Adaptation Syndrome. We recover when a stressor has ended, and we can restore homeostasis. In exhaustion, increased endocrine activity depletes body resources and raises cortisol levels, resulting in suppressed immunity and stress syndrome symptoms. Selye believed these changes could cripple immunity and cause bronchial asthma, cardiovascular disease, depression, hypertension, hyperthyroidism, peptic ulcer, ulcerative colitis, and possibly death (Brannon et al., 2022).

While Selye conceptualized stress as the outcome of the three-stage GAS, stress may occur at any time. Individuals may experience stress-related changes in anticipation of an event or after it has ended. Chronic resistance may produce more significant harm than exhaustion (Taylor, 2021).

Graphic adapted from Biostrap.




btn


While Selye made a landmark contribution to our understanding of the role of chronic stress and glucocorticoid-mediated damage in disease, critics have challenged his characterization of the stress response as nonspecific and his conceptualization of stressors. Critics have questioned the GAS on four issues.

First, since most of Selye's research subjects were nonhuman animals, this may have caused him to overlook the role of human emotion and cognitive appraisal in the chronic stress response.

Second, since Selye focused on stressors instead of human characteristics like biological predispositions and personality, he mistakenly assumed a uniform response to stressors. Stressors can produce different hormonal responses (Kemeny, 2003).

Third, while Selye emphasized the role of exhaustion in disease, there is more evidence that chronic resistance may produce more significant harm (Taylor, 2012).

Fourth, while Selye conceptualized stress as the outcome of the GAS, both the anticipation of an event and coping with it during the resistance stage can disrupt performance and produce suffering (Taylor, 2012).


Brain Structures Involved in Stress

The four brain structures most important to the stress response are the amygdala, hypothalamus, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex.

btn


The amygdala is part of the limbic system and evaluates whether stimuli are threatening, establishing unconscious emotional memories, learning conditioned emotional responses, and producing anxiety and fear responses. The animation below is courtesy of Wikipedia.

The hypothalamus lies beneath the thalamus in the forebrain. It helps the body maintain a dynamic homeostatic balance by controlling the autonomic nervous system, endocrine system, survival behaviors (four F’s), and interconnections with the immune system. The animation below is courtesy of Wikipedia.

The Hypothalamus Receives Information About Stressors

Much of the information about stressors is relayed to the PVN. This hypothalamic nucleus organizes behavior to respond to changes in internal body states. The PVN receives input from the limbic system, cerebral cortex, hypothalamus, and brainstem structures (nucleus of the solitary tract, tegmentum and reticular formation, periaqueductal gray, locus coeruleus, and raphe system). Graphic © Alila Medical Media/Shutterstock.com.





When the PVN is excited, it releases several chemical substances, including CRH, oxytocin, arginine-vasopressin, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, growth hormone-releasing hormone, somatostatin, dopamine, enkephalin, cholecystokinin, and angiotensin.

This large variety of hormones enables the individual to respond to a wide range of stressors. Since stressful events may simultaneously present many stressors, these chemical substances allow the individual to respond completely and appropriately.

The hippocampus is part of the medial temporal lobe memory system and helps form declarative memories, allows us to navigate our environment, and prevents excessive hypothalamic CRH release. Graphic © decade3d - anatomy online/Shutterstock.com.






The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is the most anterior region of the frontal lobes. The PFC contains the orbitofrontal and ventromedial, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and anterior and ventral cingulate cortex. The PFC is responsible for the brain’s executive functions, including planning, guiding decisions using emotional intelligence, working memory, allocation of attention, and emotional experience. The PFC inhibits emotional behavior triggered by the amygdala. Graphic © 2003 by Josephine F. Wilson.


Psychoneuroimmunology (PNI)


Nonspecific and Specific Immune Mechanisms

The human body utilizes nonspecific and specific immune mechanisms to protect itself against invading organisms, damaged cells, and cancer.

The main nonspecific, or innate, mechanisms are relatively rapid in response and include anatomical barriers (skin and mucous membranes) and phagocytosis (ingestion of microorganisms) by macrophages and neutrophils. Natural killer cells and neutrophils destroy infectious agents. Nonspecific mechanisms release antimicrobial agents (hydrochloric acid, interferons, and lysozymes) and signal to other immune responders. Local inflammatory responses confine microbes, allowing white blood cells and other immune cells to attack them.

In contrast, specific or adaptive immune mechanisms are generally slower and aim to target invaders and diseased cells selectively. The specific immune response involves the production and proliferation of antibodies by B cells, targeted destruction of foreign material by T cells, and preparation for future infiltrations of the same antigen (Shaffer & Mannion, 2016). In the illustration below, macrophages arrive to protect endangered cells. Graphic © UGREEN 3S/Shutterstock.com.




btn


We develop specific immunity after birth through exposure to microorganisms and vaccinations, and it employs an antigen-antibody reaction to protect us against specific microorganisms and their toxins. Antigens are foreign molecules (proteins or polysaccharides) that stimulate antibody production. Antibodies are cellular proteins that combine with antigens to neutralize them.

Humoral and cell-mediated immunity are two types of specific immune responses. In humoral immunity, B lymphocytes rapidly produce antibodies that counter bacteria into the blood, neutralize toxins, and prevent reinfection by viruses. The illustration below shows lymphocytes (white) attacking bacteria. Graphic © dreamerb/Shutterstock.com.






Activated B cells differentiate into plasma cells, which secrete antibodies (immunoglobulins), and memory B cells, which are transformed into antigen-specific plasma cells when they reencounter the original antigen. Humoral immunity is most effective in countering bacterial infections and preventing new viral infections. The illustration below shows lymphocytes (white) attacking bacteria. Graphic © Designua/Shutterstock.com.





Cell-mediated immunity
provides a slower cellular response that utilizes cytotoxic and helper T cells from T lymphocytes provided by the thymus gland. Cytotoxic T (TC) cells release toxins to destroy specific virally infected cells. Helper T (TH) cells release cytokines like interleukin-2 to aid TC and B cells' action and macrophages. TH cell cytokines can also suppress immune responses. Cell-mediated immunity is most effective in controlling cancer, foreign tissue, fungal and viral infections, and parasites.


Two-Way Brain-Immune System Communication

Nervous and immune system communication is bidirectional. From the nervous system side, the adrenal cortical release of glucocorticoids suppresses immunity, including cell-mediated mechanisms like phagocytosis. At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, admitted patients with higher cortisol levels were more likely to die from this infection (Tan et al., 2020).

From the immune system side, increased proinflammatory cytokine release can signal the nervous system, resulting in feelings of depression, fatigue, loss of energy, and reduced pleasure (Anisman et al., 2005; Brannon et al., 2022; Dantzer et al., 2008). Acute and prolonged brain fog due to COVID-19 has been attributed to elevated cytokine levels (Theoharides et al., 2021). Graphic © Designua/Shutterstock.com.






Check out Professor Gillian Griffiths' video Killer T Cell: The Cancer Assassin.


The Immune System Is Interconnected with the Nervous System

The classical model of the immune system is that it operates independently of the nervous system and psychological processes. However, researchers have demonstrated complex interactions among the nervous, endocrine, and immune systems, consistent with Green and Green's psychophysiological principle. Psychological processes like expectancies (placebo effect) and learning (classical conditioning) can affect all three systems, and the immune system can affect psychological functioning (drowsiness from a fever). Psychoneuroimmunology is a multidisciplinary field that studies the interactions between behavior and these three systems.

After Solomon and Moos (1964) introduced the term psychoneuroimmunology in a journal article, Ader and Cohen's (1975) demonstration of classical conditioning in a rat's immune system helped establish this field's scientific legitimacy.

Ader and Cohen trained rats to associate a conditioned stimulus (a saccharine and water solution) with an unconditioned stimulus (the immunosuppressive drug cyclophosphamide). This resulted in a conditioned response (CR) of immune suppression, which resulted in rat fatalities. Following conditioning, rats who drank only sweetened water (CS) died due to conditioned immunosuppression. Successful replication of these findings helped overcome resistance to the controversial view that the nervous and immune systems interact.

The mechanisms underlying these complex interactions include HPA axis hormones (ACTH, cortisol, CRH, epinephrine, and norepinephrine), immune cell chemical messengers called cytokines (interleukins), additional hormones (androgens, estrogens, progesterone, and growth hormone), and neuropeptides. Neuropeptides are chains of amino acids, like beta-endorphins, that neurons use for communication.

Stress and Immunity

There is persuasive evidence that stressful life events can reduce immunity and that behavioral interventions can enhance or maintain it. Bereavement can reduce lymphocyte (lymphatic white blood cell) proliferation (Schleifer et al., 1983). Academic exams, marital conflict, negative affect associated with stress, clinical and subclinical depression, and negative daily mood can suppress immunity (Herbert & Cohen, 1993; Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 2002; Stone et al., 1994).

The stress of living near the Three Mile Island nuclear plant when it experienced a significant accident reduced residents' B cell, T cell, and natural killer cell counts compared with control subjects (McKinnon et al., 1989).

A study of Alzheimer's caregivers showed lowered immunity and longer wound healing times, and worse psychological and physical health than controls who were not caregivers (Kiecolt-Glaser, 1999). The Alzheimer's patients' deaths did not improve caregiver immunity or psychological functioning (Robinson-Whelen et al., 2001).

Finally, laboratory stressors produced more significant discomfort and immunosuppression in chronically-stressed young males than in those not chronically stressed (Pike et al., 1994). Exposure to chronic stress may have intensified their subjects' response to acute laboratory stressors.

Behavioral Interventions Can Strengthen Immunity

Behavioral interventions can increase immunocompetence. Miller and Cohen's (2001) meta-analytical study of behavioral interventions showed modest increases in immunity. Hypnosis increased immune function more than relaxation and stress management.

A stress management program incorporating relaxation training reduced symptoms and increased salivary antibodies and psychological functioning in children diagnosed with frequent upper respiratory infections (Hewson-Bower & Drummond, 2001).

College students who wrote journal entries about highly stressful experiences increased lymphocyte proliferation and made fewer health center visits (Pennebaker et al., 1988). Smyth et al. (1999) asked asthma and rheumatoid arthritis patients to write journal entries about highly stressful experiences or planned daily activities. At a 4-month follow-up, 50% of the Pennebaker journal group who wrote about stressful experiences and 25% of the control group achieved clinically significant improvement in their immune-related disorders (Crider, 2004).

Dental and medical students who received hypnosis training maintained immune function, while a control group showed declines in immunity (Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 2001). This finding suggests that behavioral interventions may be more effective in maintaining normal immunity than boosting immunity (Brannon et al., 2022).

Cognitive Appraisal of Stressors and Coping


Lazarus and Folkman's (1984) Transactional Model of Stress has more strongly influenced psychologists than Selye's General Adaptation Syndrome.

Caption: Richard Lazarus

Whereas Selye's stimulus model theorized that events determine stress, Lazarus' cognitive model proposed that stress is determined by our perception of the situation and emphasizes person-environment fit (Taylor, 2012).

Coping is central to the Transactional Model of Stress. Lazarus and Folkman defined it as "constantly changing cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage specific external and/or internal demands that are appraised as taxing or exceeding the resources of the person” (1984, p. 141). Coping is an effortful learned process whose goal is to manage a situation (Brannon et al., 2022).




Listen to a mini-lecture on the Transactional Model of Stress © BioSource Software LLC.

btn


In primary appraisal, we categorize the consequences of events as positive, neutral, or negative and determine whether an event is relevant, negative, or potentially negative. We evaluate these events for their possible harm, threat, or challenge.

Harm
is damage that has already occurred. For example, a person who experiences a heart attack may perceive harm as damage to the heart muscle. Threat means damage that could arise in the future. The heart attack survivor may anticipate restricted physical activity and reduced income. The perception of an event as a threat has physiological consequences and can result in elevated blood pressure. Challenge is the potential to cope with the event and gain from this opportunity. The heart attack survivor may reframe this health crisis as an opportunity to make a career change. The perception of an event as a challenge can increase perceived self-efficacy and positive emotion while lowering blood pressure (Maier et al., 2003).

The Chinese pictogram wei ji, representing danger and opportunity, illustrates the negative and positive possibilities considered during primary appraisal.




During secondary appraisal, we evaluate whether our coping abilities and resources can surmount an event's harm, threat, or challenge. Lazarus and Folkman (1984) listed health and energy, positive belief, problem-solving skills, social skills, social support, and material resources as necessary coping resources. Again, perception of our coping abilities and resources is more important than their actual existence.

The balance between primary and secondary appraisal determines how we subjectively experience the event. We experience the most stress when perceived harm or threat is high and perceived coping skills and resources are low. Stress is reduced when we perceive that our coping abilities and resources are high (Taylor, 2012).

Secondary appraisal can lead to our use of direct action, reappraisal, and palliation.

Direct action can take different forms depending on the nature of the threat. We may use aggression and escape behaviors from Cannon's fight-or-flight response for violent threats to our survival. We may use problem-solving for medical or psychological threats, define the problem, identify options, and test these options until we succeed. A cardiac patient may enroll in a cardiac rehabilitation program to increase exercise tolerance and reduce the risk of artery narrowing.

Reappraisal may reduce stress when direct action is impractical or unsuccessful. Reappraisal modifies our perception of a threat. When overwhelmed by traumatic stress, individuals may initially use ineffective strategies like denial and rationalization. As they cope with the crisis, they may progress with more successful strategies like reframing in which they place the stressful situation in perspective and focus on available opportunities. For example, a cardiac patient may decide that his heart attack allowed him to spend more time with his grandchildren.

Palliation consists of efforts to reduce our stress response rather than attack the stressor. Clinicians may use biofeedback and adjunctive techniques like effortless breathing to teach cardiac patients to control their anxiety. While this does not correct the cause of the stress response, it is often superior to medications like anxiolytics that risk side effects, tolerance, physical dependence, and withdrawal effects. Successful clinical interventions for chronic problems like anxiety, depression, and pain incorporate effective palliation since complete remission may be unlikely. The diagram below was adapted from Crider (2004).



Evaluation

The Transactional Model of Stress encompasses cognitive appraisal, missing from the General Adaptation Syndrome. Research supports this model. For example, performance is better when we perceive an event as challenging instead of threatening (Moore et al., 2012).

Lazarus and Folkman's model recognizes that we constantly change as we cope with stressors and that our coping successes and failures influence our appraisals of future events (Brannon et al., 2022).  


The Effect of the Perception that Stress Impacts Health

Cannon (1942) studied voodoo deaths in shamanistic cultures and published speculation about how beliefs can produce lethal cascades of system failure in the American Anthropologist. Graphic © Fer Gregory/Shutterstock.com.



Keller et al. (2012) conducted a regression analysis of the 1998 National Health Interview Survey and prospective National Death Index data from 28,753 adults. Both elevated levels of reported stress and the perception that stress negatively impacted health independently and jointly predicted poor physical and psychological health outcomes. Artist: Dani S @ unclebelang on Fiverr.




While neither variable independently predicted premature death, subjects who reported high levels of stress and the perception that stress impacts health experienced a 43% greater risk of early death.




Listen to a mini-lecture on the Effect of the Perception That Stress Harms Health © BioSource Software LLC.

Check out Kelly McGonigal's TED Talk How to Make Stress Your Friend. McGonigal proposes that we train clients to reframe sympathetic activation as evidence of our courage to rise to a challenge instead of the body injuring itself.



Personality Dimensions

The personality dimensions of mastery, impulsiveness, hopelessness, optimism, and pessimism, and constructs like alexithymia and reactivity are important to understanding stress responses.

btn

Mastery

Mastery overlaps with the concepts of locus of control, perceived control, and self-efficacy. Mastery is the relatively stable expectancy that we can control personal outcomes. Graphic © pamspix/iStockphoto.com.






Mastery affects our appraisal and coping with stressors. Individuals with high levels of mastery expect to succeed when challenged by stressors, cope more effectively, and report lower levels of depression and stress than people with low levels of mastery (Gurung, 2019).

In Weiss’ (1977) replication of the Brady “executive monkey” study, the "executive” rat could switch off the tail shock by turning the wheel. Because it had control over the shock, it was no more likely to develop ulcers than an unshocked control rat. The "subordinate" rat received the same shocks as the "executive" rat. Because the "subordinate" rat had no control over the shocks, it was more likely to develop ulcers than the "executive" rat.

Impulsiveness

Distress can increase impulsive behavior that produces immediate relief or pleasure, sometimes at the cost of personal health (Tice et al., 2001). Graphic © YouraPechkin/iStockphoto.com.






Examples include binge drinking, suspending medication and physical exercise, consuming unhealthy meals, and defaulting on responsibilities like attending class or work. Substance abuse may reduce an individual's motivation and capacity to meet their commitments.

Hopelessness

Hopelessness is a depressive symptom that might be an independent heart attack risk factor. Compared with middle-aged Finnish men scoring low in hopelessness, those scoring high were two to three times more vulnerable to a heart attack over the ensuing 6 years and three to four times more likely to die (Everson et al., 1996). Graphic © microcosmos/Shutterstock.




Optimism

Optimism is a generalized expectancy of positive future outcomes. Optimists focus on a situation's positive dimensions, minimizing daily hassles (Nelson et al., 1995). Graphic © hidesy/iStockphoto.com.






Optimism aids health by encouraging more effective problem-focused coping strategies instead of avoidant coping strategies. These strategies result in better stress management and practice of health-promoting behaviors like barrier protection during sex. Optimists show good psychological health, effective natural killer (NK) cell response during stress, and slower AIDS progression. In the context of the Transactional Model of Stress, optimists diverge from pessimists in secondary appraisal, actions, and personal adjustment (Gurung, 2019).

A prospective study showed that the 25 percent most optimistic women had about a 30 percent lower mortality risk than the 25 percent least optimistic women. Dispositional optimism was associated with reduced mortality due to cancer, heart disease, infection, respiratory disease, and stroke. While attenuated, these results held up after controlling socioeconomic status, depression, health conditions, and health-related behaviors (Kim et al., 2016).

Pessimism

Pessimism, a generalized expectancy of future adverse outcomes, is also a heart attack risk factor. A Harvard School of Public Health team found pessimistic adult men had a doubled risk of developing heart disease over 10 years (Kubzansky et al., 2001).





Alexithymia

Wickramasekera (1988) described alexithymics as low in hypnotic ability and awareness of internal cues and feelings associated with illness. Alexithymia is prevalent in patients with multiple psychosomatic complaints and may delay seeking and receiving medical attention.

Reactivity

Eliot's (1992) hot reactors cannot be identified by their overt behavior but risk sudden death due to pathological acute and chronic responses to stressors. Hot reactors show an acute increase in catecholamine secretion, which increases the risk of cardiac arrhythmia due to excessive myocardial fiber contraction and clot formation. When challenged by long-term stressors and experience fear, uncertainty, and loss of control, they also show a chronic increase in glucocorticoid secretion, which raises total cholesterol while lowering protective HDL-C.

African Americans start to show greater reactivity than their European American counterparts by childhood (Murphy et al., 1995), perhaps due to stressors associated with their ethnicity. This difference may help explain their higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease.

Everson et al. (2001) discovered that the risk of stroke was more significant for men with higher systolic blood pressure reactivity.

Resources to Buffer Stress


Social Support

Social support consists of received support (support provided) and perceived support (expected support) from individuals and organizations. Both forms of social support include informational, material, and psychological assistance from others. The value of each kind of social support depends on an individual's specific needs. Graphic © Yuri/iStockphoto.com.




btn


Social networks and social contacts both concern the number and kinds of an individual’s interpersonal relationships. A social network is a social structure consisting of nodes (individuals or organizations) tied together. Social contacts are the nodes (individuals or organizations) comprising a person’s social network.

Patients with a high level of social support participate in an extensive social network consisting of numerous social contacts. Those with low social support have a limited social network with few social connections.

High levels of social support are associated with better health, faster recuperation, less psychological distress, lower depression risk, and lower mortality than low levels of social support (Gurung, 2019). Graphic © Ljupco Smokovski/Shutterstock.com.






The Alameda County Study (Berkman & Syme, 1979) documented a relationship between social contacts and longevity. Adults with the fewest social connections had 2-4 times the risk of death than those with the most social contacts. Gender and age moderated the effect of social connection. Males' highest relative risk of death (3.2) was from age 50-59, whereas women's highest relative risk (4.6) was from age 30-49 (Brannon et al., 2022).




Listen to a mini-lecture on the importance of social contact © BioSource Software LLC. Graphic © Ljupco Smokovski/Shutterstock.com.



Hawkley and colleagues (2006) reported that loneliness is an independent risk factor for hypertension comparable to obesity and a sedentary lifestyle. They studied 229 participants aged 50 to 68 years and measured their perceived degree of loneliness and previously established cardiovascular and psychosocial risk factors. Even after statistically controlling for other negative emotional states (e.g., depression, hostility, or stress), lonely older participants had systolic blood pressures up to 30 mmHg higher than their non-lonely counterparts. They discovered that loneliness and stress raised blood pressure via different mechanisms and produced an additive effect. Furthermore, the impact of loneliness on blood pressure increased with age.


Prosocial Behavior

A prospective study of 846 adults by Poulin et al. (2013) showed that providing tangible assistance to friends or family members in the previous year buffered the effects of stress on mortality over 5 years. In contrast, stress predicted mortality for participants who did not help others. Artist: Dani S @ unclebelang on Fiverr.




Follow-up data from the longitudinal National Survey of Midlife Development in the U.S. (MIDUS II) of 1054 middle-aged adults found that women who perceived that they supported others in positive social relationships had lower IL-6 levels, which is a marker for inflammation (Jiang et al., 2021). Elevated IL-6 levels are linked to an increased risk for serious diseases.




Listen to a mini-lecture on the importance of prosocial behavior © BioSource Software LLC.

Graphic © Monkey Business Images/Shutterstock.com.




Aerobic Exercise

A sedentary lifestyle marked by prolonged sitting and TV-viewing time was linked to chronic health conditions and all-cause mortality in a meta-analysis of data from over 1 million middle-aged men and women. Individuals who engaged in moderate-intensity exercise for 60-75 minutes per day eliminated the increased risk of death due to sitting but only attenuated the risk associated with TV-viewing time (Ekelund et al., 2016). Graphic © racornShutterstock.com.





Mildly depressed college women who participated in an aerobic exercise program showed markedly reduced depression compared with those who did relaxation exercises or received no treatment (McCann & Holmes, 1984). Graphic © Maksim Toome/Shutterstock.com.




btn


A study that compared exercise with drug treatment or a combination of exercise and drug treatment found that exercise improved mood and the other two conditions. When treatment was discontinued, participants who continued to exercise were less likely to relapse than those who had received drug treatment (Babyak et al., 2000).

The positive impact of exercise on mood may be mediated by reduced cardiovascular reactivity (Perkins et al., 1986), social involvement (Estabrooks & Carron, 1999), and increased self-efficacy (McAuley et al., 2003), and self-esteem (Sonstroem, 1997).


Religious and Spiritual Activity

In a national health survey financed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, religiously active people had longer life expectancies (Hummer et al., 1999). McCullough and colleagues (2000) performed a meta-analysis that assigned greater weights to studies that controlled confounding variables like age, gender, health, and social support. They found that religious involvement was linked to a slightly lower mortality rate and was not due to social support. Graphic © LincolnRogers/ iStockphoto.com.






Glossary


activated states: in Barrett and Russell’s structural model, high-intensity affective states like tenseness and alertness are placed in the upper hemisphere.

acute stress response: the autonomic changes that occur at the end of Selye’s alarm stage, for example, increased heart rate.

adaptation energy: in Selye’s General Adaptation Syndrome, the capacity of local organs to respond to the demands created by stressors. Depletion of adaptation energy theoretically results in local adaptation syndromes like muscle fatigue and tissue inflammation.

adrenal cortex: the outer region of the adrenal gland that produces the hormone cortisol.

adrenal medulla: the inner region of the adrenal gland that produces the hormones epinephrine and norepinephrine.

affective intensity: in Barrett and Russell’s structural model, a dimension that ranges from activated to deactivated states.

affective valence: in Barrett and Russell’s structural model, a dimension that ranges from unpleasant to pleasant affective states.

alarm: the first stage of Selye’s General Adaptation Syndrome that consists of shock and countershock phases.

alexithymics: individuals who are low in hypnotic ability and awareness of internal cues and feelings associated with illness. Alexithymia is prevalent in patients with multiple psychosomatic complaints and may delay their seeking and receiving medical attention.

allostasis: the maintenance of stability through change by mechanisms that anticipate challenge and adapt through behavior and physiological change.

allostatic load model: McEwen and Seeman’s hypothesis that when stressors are acute or repeatedly occur, biological responses to stress can harm the body.

amygdala: a limbic system structure that participates in evaluating whether stimuli are threatening, establishing unconscious emotional memories, learning conditioned emotional responses, and producing anxiety and fear responses.

anger-in dimension: Diamond’s hypothesized tendency to withhold the expression of anger, even when anger is warranted.

antibodies: immune system proteins called immunoglobulins that recognize and neutralize bacteria and viruses.

antigen-antibody reaction: antibodies permanently bind to antigens and neutralize them.

antigens: foreign molecules (proteins or polysaccharides) that trigger an immune response.

anxiogenic: there is an anxiety-producing pathway from the raphe system to the hippocampus.

anxiolytic: there is an anxiety-reducing pathway from the raphe system to the hippocampus.

avoidant coping strategies: coping by refusing to recognize potential problems.

B lymphocytes:
the immune cells central to humoral immunity that rapidly produce antibodies that counter bacteria into the blood, neutralize toxins, and prevent reinfection by viruses.

biomedical model: the conventional view that illness is primarily due to biological abnormalities.

biopsychosocial model: Engel’s perspective that the complex interplay of psychological, biological, and sociological factors results in health or illness.

cardiovascular reactivity (CVR): changes in cardiovascular function due to physical or psychological challenges. For example, increased blood pressure and heart rate in response to social stressors like a provocation.

catecholamines: chemical compounds containing catechol and amine groups, like dopamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine, derived from the amino acid tyrosine.

cell-mediated immunity: the slower, cellular response that utilizes cytotoxic and helper T cells from T lymphocytes provided by the thymus gland and is most effective in controlling cancer, foreign tissue, fungal and viral infections, and parasites.

central nucleus of the amygdala: the region of the amygdala that orchestrates the amygdala’s response to stressors. For example, it activates the hypothalamus's paraventricular nucleus (PVN), resulting in increased CRH release to the pituitary gland.

challenge: In Lazarus and Folkman’s Transactional Model of stress, an individual’s assessment during primary appraisal of her potential to cope with an event and gain from this opportunity.

conditioned immunosuppression: classically conditioned suppression of immunity. For example, in Ader and Cohen’s research, rats conditioned with sweetened water and an immunosuppressive drug died after only drinking the water.

conditioned response (CR): in classical conditioning, a response (blood pressure rise) elicited by a conditioned stimulus (criticism).

conditioned stimulus: in classical conditioning, a stimulus (dentist's office) that in association with an unconditioned stimulus (pain) elicits a conditioned response (anxiety) like the original unconditioned response.

corrugator: the muscle used in frowning whose SEMG level is correlated with negative affect.

corticotropin (ACTH): the hormone released by the pituitary gland following CRH binding triggers cortisol release by the adrenal cortex.

corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH): hormone released by the hypothalamus that triggers ACTH release by the pituitary gland.

cortisol: a glucocorticoid produced by the adrenal cortex that helps convert fat and protein to glucose and reduces inflammation.

countershock phase: the last part of Selye’s alarm stage of the General Adaptation Syndrome, during which resistance increases due to increased activity by local defenses.

cynical hostility: mistrust of humanity and those with whom they interact. This attitude is associated with alcohol consumption, obesity, and smoking, which affect the development of heart disease.

cytokines (interleukins): immune cell chemical messengers that can aid the action of cytotoxic T (Tc) and B cells and macrophages.

cytotoxic T (Tc) cells: immune cells that release toxins to destroy specific virally infected cells.

deactivated states: in Barrett and Russell’s structural model, lower-intensity affective states like fatigue and calm are placed in the lower hemisphere.

diathesis: inherited or acquired biological vulnerability. For example, obesity is a diathesis for diabetes.

direct action: in Lazarus and Folkman’s Transactional Model of Stress, this is an active attempt to resolve a threat that may follow secondary appraisal. For example, enrolling in a cardiac rehabilitation program following a diagnosis of coronary artery narrowing.

diseases of adaptation: in Selye’s General Adaptation Syndrome, depletion of adaptation energy theoretically results in adaptation syndromes like atrial tachycardia.

distress: Selye’s term for stress due to negative stimuli.

dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is concerned with approach behavior and positive affect. It helps select positive goals and organizes and implements behavior to achieve these goals. The right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex organizes withdrawal-related behavior and negative affect and mediates threat-related vigilance. It plays a role in working memory for object location.

dove strategy: the passive, reactive, nonaggressive, and cautious response to stressors.

dysbiosis: an imbalance in the composition or function of the gut microbiota, often linked to health issues. the gut-brain axis is the bidirectional communication network between the gastrointestinal system and the central nervous system, involving neural, hormonal, and immune pathways.

ejection fraction: the ratio of blood pumped by the left ventricle during a contraction compared to its total filling volume.

epinephrine: an adrenal medullary hormone that increases muscle blood flow, converts stored nutrients into glucose for use by skeletal muscles, and initiates cardiac muscle contraction when it binds to β1 receptors.

epigenetic: the modification of gene expression due to environmental influences.

eustress: Selye’s term for stress due to positive stimuli.

exhaustion: the third stage of Selye’s General Adaptation Syndrome, during which increased endocrine activity depletes body resources and raises cortisol levels resulting in suppressed immunity, stress syndrome symptoms, and possible hospitalization and death.

expressed anger: a component of hostility involving direct communication of anger. For example, raising your voice during an argument.

fibrinogen: a plasma protein that is transformed into fibrin to form blood clots.

fight-or-flight response: Cannon’s response of confronting or fleeing a threat that occurs at the end of Selye’s alarm stage.

General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS): Selye proposed that diverse stressors produce a three-stage (alarm, resistance, and exhaustion) autonomic and endocrine response in all subjects.

gut-brain axis: the bidirectional communication network between the gastrointestinal system and the central nervous system, involving neural, hormonal, and immune pathways.

hardiness: the ability to thrive under stressful conditions.

harm: in Lazarus and Folkman's Transactional Model of Stress, damage that has already occurred. For example, a heart attack survivor may perceive harm as damage to the heart muscle.

hassle: minor stressful event, for example, waiting in a checkout line.

Hassles and Uplifts Scale: DeLongis, Folkman, and Lazarus’ revised 53-item scale measured hassle frequency and intensity. This scale better predicted headache frequency and intensity and inflammatory bowel disease frequency than the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS).

Hassles Scale: Kanner and colleagues’ 117-item scale that measures negative daily experiences.

hawk strategy: the proactive and bold response to stressors.

heart rate variability (HRV): beat-to-beat changes in heart rate, including changes in the RR intervals between consecutive heartbeats.

helper T (TH) cells: immune cells that release cytokines like interleukin-2 to aid the action of Tc and B cells and macrophages. TH cell cytokines can also suppress immune responses.

hippocampal formation: the limbic structure that regulates the endocrine system’s response to stressors, forming explicit memories, and navigation. Cortisol binding to this structure disrupts these functions, interferes with creating new neurons, and harms and kills hippocampal neurons.

hopelessness: a depressive symptom that might be an independent heart attack risk factor.

hostility: a negative attitude towards individuals that may persist for a long time.

hot reactors: Eliot’s category of individuals who risk sudden death due to pathological acute and chronic responses to stressors.

humoral immunity: rapid immune response mediated by B lymphocytes, which produce antibodies that counter bacteria into the blood, neutralize toxins, and prevent reinfection by viruses.
 
hyperglycemia: elevated blood sugar that chronic high levels of cortisol can produce.

hyperinsulinemia: elevated insulin secretion that chronic high levels of cortisol can produce.

hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis: a hormonal cascade that starts with signals from the amygdala to the hypothalamus and ultimately targets the adrenal glands, releasing the hormones CRH, ACTH (corticotropin), and cortisol.

hypothalamus: the forebrain structure located below the thalamus that dynamically maintains homeostasis by controlling the autonomic nervous system, endocrine system, survival behaviors, and interconnections with the immune system.

intersectionality: social identities (e.g., biological sex, class, gender identity, and race) interact to produce discrimination and disadvantage or advantage.

locus of control: Rotter’s concept of a continuum of control of outcomes where internals attribute outcomes to their efforts and externals attribute them to external events. This concept overlaps with the concepts of mastery, perceived control, and self-efficacy.

lymphocytes: white blood cells, including T cells, B cells, and natural killer (Nk) cells, that play a crucial role in immune defenses.

mastery: the relatively stable expectancy that we can control our outcomes. This concept overlaps with locus of control, perceived control, and self-efficacy.

memory B cells: lymphocytes transformed into antigen-specific plasma cells when they reencounter the original antigen.

microbiome: the collection of the microorganisms that reside in the human body.

negative affective states: in Barrett and Russell’s structural model, unpleasant states like sadness are located in the left hemisphere.

negative affectivity:
the predisposition toward distress and dissatisfaction. Individuals rated high on this trait negatively perceive themselves, others, and the environment and have a pessimistic perspective.

neuropeptides: the chains of amino acids, like beta-endorphins, used by neurons to communicate and bind to metabotropic receptors.

nonspecific immune mechanisms: anatomical barriers (skin and mucous membranes), phagocytosis (ingestion of microorganisms) by lymphocytes (T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells), the release of antimicrobial agents (hydrochloric acid, interferons, and lysozyme), and local inflammatory responses that confine microbes and allow white blood cells to attack them.

nonspecificity: diverse stressors produce consistent physiological change that Mason argued was due to eliciting common emotional states.

norepinephrine: an adrenal medullary hormone that increases muscle blood flow and converts stored nutrients into glucose for skeletal muscles.

nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus: when activated by the central nucleus of the amygdala, this nucleus releases CRH to the pituitary gland.

optimism: a generalized expectancy of positive future outcomes. Optimists focus on a situation's positive dimensions, minimizing daily hassles.

oxytocin: a hormone and neurotransmitter that may contribute to social bonding, anxiety following exposure to stressors, and the milk letdown reflex.

palliation: in Lazarus and Folkman’s Transactional Model of Stress, secondary appraisal can lead to efforts to reduce our stress response rather than attack the stressor.

parasympathetic responder: a response stereotypy involving increased digestive activity, alveoli constriction, fainting, and freezing when challenged by stressors.

perceived control: an individual’s expectancy that they can influence their outcomes. This concept overlaps with the concepts of locus of control, mastery, and self-efficacy.

Perceived Stress Scale (PSS): Cohen and colleagues’ scale that measures perceived hassles, major life changes, and shifts in coping resources during the previous month using a 14-item scale. PSS items assess the degree to which respondents rate their lives as unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded.

perceived support: expected social support.

pessimism: generalized expectancy of future adverse outcomes, a heart attack risk factor.

phagocytosis: the ingestion of microorganisms by immune cells like lymphocytes and macrophages.

pituitary gland: the endocrine gland found at the base of the skull that is divided into the anterior pituitary, which secretes the tropic hormones adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), prolactin, and growth hormone (GH), and the posterior pituitary that releases oxytocin and vasopressin produced by the hypothalamus.

plasma cells: activated B lymphocytes that secrete antibodies called immunoglobulins.

positive states: in Barrett and Russell’s structural model, pleasant states like contentment are located in the right hemisphere.

post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): a severe and long-lasting trauma and stressor-related disorder that often develops within three months of a traumatic event and may include re-experiencing a traumatic event, avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma, numbing of responsiveness, and hyperarousal.

prefrontal cortex (PFC): the most anterior region of the frontal lobes divided into orbitofrontal and ventromedial, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and anterior and ventral cingulate cortex subdivisions, and is responsible for the brain’s executive functions.

primary appraisal: in Lazarus and Folkman’s Transaction Model of Stress, the first stage of our response to an event during which we categorize the consequences of events as positive, neutral, or negative and determine whether an event is relevant and negative or potentially negative. We evaluate these events for their possible harm, threat, or challenge.

problem-focused coping strategies: plans to resolve problems that are encouraged by optimism.

protein kinase C (PKC): an enzyme activated by uncontrollable stressful situations that interferes with PFC functions and may result in symptoms of distractibility, impulsiveness, and poor judgment seen in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

psychoneuroimmunology: Solomon and Moos’ term for a multidisciplinary field that studies the interactions between behavior and the nervous system, endocrine system, and immune system.

raphe system: a network of brainstem serotonergic neurons that includes anxiety-producing and anxiety-reducing pathways that terminate in the hippocampus.

reappraisal: in Lazarus and Folkman’s Transaction Model of Stress, secondary appraisal can modify our perception of a threat when direct action is impractical or unsuccessful.

received support: support provided.

reframing: a reappraisal strategy in which they place the stressful situation in perspective and focus on available opportunities.

resistance: the second stage of Selye’s GAS where local defenses have made the generalized stress response unnecessary. Both cortisol output and stress symptoms, like adrenal gland enlargement, decline.

response stereotypy: a person’s unique response pattern to stressors of identical intensity.

secondary appraisal: in Lazarus and Folkman’s Transaction Model of Stress, the second stage of our response to an event during which we evaluate whether our coping abilities and resources can surmount an event's harm, threat, or challenge.

self-efficacy: an individual’s expectancy that they can influence their outcomes. This concept overlaps with locus of control, mastery, and perceived control.

shock phase: the first part of Selye’s alarm stage of the GAS that includes the reduced body stress resistance and increased autonomic arousal and hormone release (ACTH, cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine) that comprise the “fight-or-flight” response.

sleep reactivity: the tendency for sleep to be disrupted by stress.

social contacts: the nodes (individuals or organizations) comprising a person’s social network.

social network: a social structure consisting of nodes (individuals or organizations) tied together.

Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS): Holmes and Rahe measured major positive and negative life changes using their Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS), which lists 43 events, each assigned a different Life Change Unit (LCU) value.

social support: received (support provided) and perceived support (expected support) from individuals and organizations.

specific immunity: humoral and cell-mediated immune responses that protect us against specific microorganisms and their toxins developed after birth through exposure to microorganisms and vaccinations.

stress: Selye’s term for a nonspecific response to stimuli called stressors.

stress-diathesis model: the view that stressors interact with our inherited or acquired biological vulnerabilities, diatheses, producing medical and psychological symptoms.

stressors: Selye’s term for stimuli that elicit the stress response.

structural model: Barrett and Russell's representation of affective states within a circumplex (circular structure) based on its degrees of affective valence (unpleasant to pleasant) and affective intensity (activation to deactivation).

sympathetic nervous system (SNS): the autonomic nervous system branch that regulates activities that expend stored energy, such as when we are excited.

sympathetic responder: a response stereotypy in which an individual may increase blood pressure, heart rate, and sweat gland activity and decrease heart rate variability and peripheral blood flow pressure when challenged by stressors.

sympathetic-adrenomedullary path (SAM) pathway: during an acute stress response, the sympathetic nervous system directs the adrenal medulla release of epinephrine and norepinephrine.

telomerase: an enzyme that adds DNA to telomeres. Telomerase levels decline with chronic stress and cellular aging.

telomere: the DNA and protein that cover the ends of chromosomes. Telomeres shorten with chronic stress and cellular aging.

tend-and-befriend response: Taylor and colleagues’ proposition that women may tend (nurture others) and befriend (seek and provide social support) in response to stressors.

threat: in Lazarus and Folkman’s Transactional Model of Stress, we evaluate events for the damage they could inflict in the future during primary appraisal.

Transactional Model of Stress: Lazarus and Folkman’s cognitive model proposed that perception of a situation determines stress.

traumatic stress: stress produced by a highly intense stressor that disrupts coping and endangers ourselves or others.

Type A-B continuum: Friedman and Rosenman’s continuum for behavioral risk of coronary artery disease.

Type A's: Friedman and Rosenman’s competitive, concerned with numbers and acquisition, hostile, and time-pressured individuals who they showed had a doubled risk of a heart attack.

Type B's: Friedman and Rosenman’s less-motivated individuals who do not usually exhibit Type A behaviors and have a reduced risk of a heart attack than extreme Type A’s.

Type D (distressed) personality: individuals who combine high levels of negative affectivity and social inhibition.

unconditioned stimulus (UCS): a stimulus (physical pain) that elicits an innate response (increased blood pressure) without prior learning.

Undergraduate Stress Questionnaire (USQ): Crandall and colleagues’ scale identifies events—mostly hassles—experienced during the past two weeks. Higher USQ scores are associated with increased use of health services.

uplift: minor positive events like receiving an unexpected call from a friend.

Uplifts Scale: Kanner and colleagues’ 138-item scale that measures positive daily experiences.

urban press: Graig's concept that ever-present environmental stressors (e.g., alienation, crowding, fear of crime, noise, and pollution) can act in concert as daily hassles, harming physical and psychological health.

ventromedial prefrontal cortex: a region of the PFC that may play a role in calculating risk and the emotional responses of anxiety and fear. Cortisol binding to this structure increases anxiety and fear and disrupts and kills neurons.

wei ji: Chinese pictogram representing danger and opportunity and illustrates the negative and positive possibilities considered during primary appraisal.

zygomatic muscle: the muscle contracted during smiling.

Yerkes-Dodson curve: an inverted U-curve that illustrates the relationship between pressure and performance.

Test Yourself


Click on the ClassMarker logo to take 10-question tests over this unit without an exam password.


REVIEW FLASHCARDS ON QUIZLET


Click on the Quizlet logo to review our chapter flashcards.



Visit the BioSource Software Website


BioSource Software offers Human Physiology, which satisfies BCIA's Human Anatomy and Physiology requirement, and Biofeedback100, which provides extensive multiple-choice testing over BCIA's Biofeedback Blueprint.


Assignment


Now that you have completed this module, identify your most critical stressors and coping resources. How does your personality moderate the effects of these stressors?

References


Agustí, A., Lamers, F., Tamayo, M., Benito-Amat, C., Molina-Mendoza, G., Penninx, B., & Sanz, Y. (2023). The gut microbiome in early life stress: A systematic review. Nutrients, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15112566

Albert, C. M., Chae, C. U., Rexrode, K. M., Manson, J. E., & Kawachi, I. (2005). Phobic anxiety and risk of coronary heart disease and sudden cardiac death among women. Circulation, 111, 480-487. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000153813.64165.5D 

American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.

Andreassi, J. L. (2000). Psychophysiology: Human behavior and physiological response. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Anisman, H., Merali, Z., Poulter, M. O., & Hayley, S. (2005). Cytokines as a precipitant of depressive illness: Animal and human studies. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 11, 963–972. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612053381701

Asterita, M. F. (1985). The physiology of stress. Human Sciences Press, Inc.

Babyak, M., Blumenthal, J. A., Herman, S., Khatri, P., Doraiswamy, M., Moore, K., Craighead, W. E., Baldwicz, T. T., & Khrishnan, K. R. (2000). Exercise treatment for major depression: Maintenance of therapeutic benefit at 10 months. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 633-638. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200009000-00006

Bangasser, D. A. (2013). Sex differences in stress-related receptors: 'Micro' differences with 'macro' implications for mood and anxiety disorders. Biology of Sex Differences, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2042-6410-4-2

Bangasser, D. A., & Valentino, R. J. (2014). Sex differences in stress-related psychiatric disorders: Neurobiological perspectives. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 35(3), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.03.008

Barrett, L. F., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 967-984. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.967

Berry, D., Blair, C., Willoughby, M., & Granger, D. A. (2012). Salivary alpha-amylase and cortisol in infancy and toddlerhood: Direct and indirect relations with executive functioning and academic ability in childhood. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(10), 1700–1711

Beurel, E. (2024). Stress in the microbiome-immune crosstalk. Gut Microbes, 16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2024.2327409

Bigger, J., Fleiss, J., Rolnitzky, L., & Steinman, R. (1993). The ability of several short-term measures of RR variability to predict mortality after myocardial infarction. Circulation, 88, 927-934. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.88.3.927

Bigger, J. T., Fleiss, J. L., Steinman, R. C., Rolnitzky, L. M., Schneider, W. J., & Stein, P. K. (1995). RR variability in healthy, middle-aged persons compared with patients with chronic coronary heart disease or recent acute myocardial infarction. Circulation, 91(7), 1936-1943. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1936

Bishop, G. D. (2016). Personality and cardiovascular disease: Overview. In M. E. Alvarenga, & D. Byrne (Eds.). Handbook of psychocardiology. Springer Singapore.

Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., Germann, J., Nussbeck, F. W., Heinrichs, M., & Bradbury, T. N. (2015). Effects of stress on the social support provided by men and women in intimate relationships. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1584–1594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594616

Brannon, L., Feist, J., & Updegraff, J. A. (2022). Health psychology (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Brett, J. F., Brief, A. P., Burke, M. J., George, J. M., & Webster, J. (1990). Negative affectivity and the reporting of stressful life events. Health Psychology, 9, 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.9.1.57

Cannon, W. (1932). The wisdom of the body. Norton.


Cannon, W. (1942). Voodoo death. American Anthropologist, 44, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1942.44.2.02a00010

Carney,  R. M., Blumenthal, J. A., Freedland, K. E., Stein, P. K., Howells, W. B., Berkman, L. F., Watkins, L. L., Czajkowski, S. M., Hayano, J., Domitrovich, P. P., & Jaffe, A. S. (2005). Low heart rate variability and the effect of depression on post-myocardial infarction mortality. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165, 486-1491. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.165.13.1486

Carpenter, S. (2012). That gut feeling. Monitor on Psychology, 43(8), 50.

Casolo, G., Balli, E., Taddei, T., Amuhasi, J., & Gori, C. (1989). Decreased spontaneous heart rate variability in congestive heart failure. The American Journal of Cardiology, 64(18), 1162-1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(89)90871-0

Caspani, G., & Swann, J. (2019). Small talk: Microbial metabolites involved in the signaling from microbiota to brain. Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 48, 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2019.08.001.

Chen, Y., Xu, J., & Chen, Y. (2021). Regulation of neurotransmitters by the gut microbiota and effects on cognition in neurological disorders. Nutrients, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13062099

Chida, Y., & Steptoe, A. (2009). The association of anger and hostility with future coronary heart disease: A meta-analytic review of prospective evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol, 53(11), 936-946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.044

Christenfeld, N., Glynn, L. M., Phillips, D. P., & Shrira, I. (1999). Exposure to New York City as a risk factor for heart attack mortality. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61, 740–743. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199911000-00003

Cohen, B. (1989). Relations among autonomic responding, infant and adult emotions, temperament and personality. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(12-B, Pt. 1), 5540.

Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., Rabin, B. S., Gwaltney, J. M., & Newson, J. T. (1995). State and trait negative affect as predictors of objective and subjective symptoms of respiratory viral infections. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 86-90.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.68.1.159

Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385-396. PMID: 6668417

Committee on Health and Behavior (2001). Health and behavior: The interplay of biological, behavioral, and societal influences. National Academy Press.

Crandall, C. S., Preisler, J. J., & Aussprung, J. (1992). Measuring life event stress in the lives of college students: The Undergraduate Stress Questionnaire (USQ). Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 627-662. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00844860

Crider, A. (2004). Module 2: Stress and illness. In A. Crider & D. D. Montgomery (Eds.). Introduction to biofeedback. Association for .

David, D. H., & Lyons-Ruth (2005). Differential attachment responses of male and female infants to frightening maternal behavior: Tend or brief versus fight or flight? Infant Mental Health Journal, 26, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.20033

De Fruyt, F., & Denollet, J. (2002). Type D personality: A Five-Factor Model perspective. Psychology & Health, 17(5), 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440290025858

DeLongis, A., Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). The impact of daily stress on health and mood. Psychological and social resources as mediators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 486-495. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.486

Deykin, E. Y., Keane, T. M., Kaloupek, D., Findke, G., Rothendler, J., Siegfried, M., & Creamer, K. (2001). Posttraumatic stress disorder and the use of health services. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63, 835-841. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200109000-00018

Dohrenwend, B. S., & Dohrenwend, B. P. (1984). Life stress and illness: Formulation of the issues. In B. S. Dohrenwend & B. P. Dohrenwend (Eds.). Stressful life events and their contexts (pp. 1-27). Rutgers University Press.


Drake, C. L., Pillai, V., & Roth, T. (2014). Stress and sleep reactivity: A prospective investigation of the stress-diathesis model of insomnia. Sleep, 37(8), 1295-1304. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.3916

Eliot, R. S. (1992). Stress and the heart. Mechanisms, measurement, and management. Postgrad Med, 92(5), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1992.11701495

Engel, G. L. (1971). Sudden and rapid death during psychological stress. Folklore or folk wisdom? Annals of Internal Medicine, 74, 771-782. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-74-5-771

Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196, 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.847460

Engel, G. L. (1980). The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 535-544. PMID: 7369396

Espnes, G. A., & Byrne, D. (2016). Type A behavior and cardiovascular disease. In M. E. Alvarenga, & D. Byrne (Eds.). Handbook of psychocardiology. Springer Singapore.

Estabrooks, P. A., & Carron, A. V. (1999). Group cohesion in older adult exercisers: Prediction and intervention effects. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 575-588.
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018741712755

Evans, G. W., & Stecker, R. (2004). Motivational consequences of environmental stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00076-8

Everson, S. A., Lynch, J. W., Kaplan, G. A., Lakka, T. A., Sivenius, J., & Salonen, J. T. (2001). Stress-induced blood pressure reactivity and incident stroke in middle-aged men. Stroke, 32, 1263-1270. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.6.1263

Everson, S. A., Roberts, R. E., Goldberg, D. E., & Kaplan, G. A. (1998). Depressive symptoms and increased risk of stroke mortality over a 29-year period. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158, 1133-1138. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.10.1133

Fagan, J., Galea, S., Ahern, J., Bonner, S., & Vlahov, D. (2003). Relationship of self-reported asthma severity and urgent health care utilization to psychological sequelae of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center among New York City area residents. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 993-996. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000097334.48556.5f

Ferguson, E., Williams, L., O'Connor, R. C., Howard, S., Hughes, B. M., Johnston, D. W., Allan, J. L., O'Connor, D. B., Lewis, C. A., Grealy, M. A., & O'Carroll, R. E. (2009). A taxometric analysis of Type-D personality. Psychosomatic Medicine, 71(9), 981-986. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181bd888b

Fernandez, E., & Sheffield, J. (1996). Relative contributions of life events versus daily hassles to the frequency and intensity of headaches. Headache, 36, 595-602. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4610.1996.3610595.x

Foster, J. (2022). Modulating brain function with microbiota. Science, 376, 936 - 937. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4220

Foster, J., & Neufeld, K. (2013). Gut–brain axis: How the microbiome influences anxiety and depression. Trends in Neurosciences, 36, 305-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2013.01.005

Fox, I., & Rompolski, K. (2022). Human physiology (16th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Frasure-Smith, N., Lesperance, F., & Talajic, M. (1995). Depression and 18-month prognosis after myocardial infarction. Circulation, 91(4), 999-1005. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.91.4.999

Gaidos, S. (2016). He stress, she stress: Scientists puzzle over why men and women react differently to pressure. Science News, 189(2), 18-21.

Gao, X., Cao, Q., Cheng, Y., Zhao, D., Wang, Z., Yang, H., Wu, Q., You, L., Wang, Y., Lin, Y., Li, X., Wang, Y., Bian, J., Sun, D., Kong, L., Birnbaumer, L., & Yang, Y. (2018). Chronic stress promotes colitis by disturbing the gut microbiota and triggering immune system response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, E2960 - E2969. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720696115

Graig, E. (1993). Stress as a consequence of the urban physical environment. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (2nd ed., pp. 316–332). Free Press.

Gump, B. B., & Matthews, K. A. (2000). Are vacations good for your health? The 9-year mortality experience after the multiple risk factor intervention trial. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 608-612. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200009000-00003

Gunthert, K. C., Cohen, L. H., & Armeli, S. (1999). The role of neuroticism in daily stress and coping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1087-1100. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.1087

Gurung, R. A. R. (2019). Health psychology: Well-being in a diverse world (4th ed.). Thompson Wadsworth.

Haas, A. P., Eliason, M., Mays, V. M., Mathy, R. M., & Cochran, S. D. (2011). Suicide and suicide risk in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations: Review and recommendations. Journal of Homosexuality, 58(1), 10-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2011.534038

Hall, M., Vasko, R., Buysse, D., Ombao, H., Chen, Q., Cashmere, J. D., . . . Thayer, J. F. (2004). Acute stress affects heart rate variability during sleep. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66(1), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000106884.58744.09

Harrell, E. H., Kelly, K., & Stutts, W. A. (1996). Situational determinants of correlations between serum cortisol and self-reported stress measures. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 33, 22-25.

Hamamah, S., Aghazarian, A., Nazaryan, A., Hajnal, A., & Cova?a, M. (2022). Role of microbiota-gut-brain axis in regulating dopaminergic signaling. Biomedicines, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10020436 Hawkley, L. C., Masi, C. M., Berry, J. D., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2006). Loneliness is a unique predictor of age-related differences in systolic blood pressurePsychology and Aging, 21(1), 152-164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.152

Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(67)90010-4

Jiang, T., Yakin, S., Crocker, J., & May, B. M. (2021). Perceived social support-giving moderates the association between social relationships and interleukin-6. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, S0889-1591(21)00598-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2021.11.002

Johnson, J. H. (1986). Life events as stressors in childhood and adolescence. Sage.

Johnston-Brooks, C. H., Lewis, M. A., Evans, G. W., Whalen, C. K. (1998). Chronic stress and illness in children: The role allostatic load. Psychosomatic Medicine, 60, 597-603. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199809000-0001

Jonas, B. S., & Mussolino, M. E. (2000). Symptoms of depression as a prospective risk factor for stroke. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 463-471. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200007000-00001

Juster, R. P., McEwen, B. S., & Lupien, S. J. (2010). Allostatic load bio-markers of chronic stress and impact on health and cognition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.002

Kanner, A. D., Coyne, J. C., Schaefer, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00844845

Karl, J., Hatch, A., Arcidiacono, S., Pearce, S., Pantoja-Feliciano, I., Doherty, L., & Soares, J. (2018). Effects of psychological, environmental and physical stressors on the gut microbiota. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02013

Karlamangla, A. S., Singer, B. H., & Seeman, T. E. (2006). Reduction in allostatic load in older adults is associated with lower all-cause mortality risk: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68, 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000221270.93985.82

Katz, M. J., Derby, C. A., Wang, C., Sliwinski, M. J., Martin, J., Ezzati, A., . . . Lipton, R. B. (in press). Influence of perceived stress on incident amnestic mild cognitive impairment: Results from the Einstein Aging Study. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000125

Kawachi, I., Colditz, G. A., Ascherio, A., Rimm, E. B., Giovannucci, E., Stampfer, M. J., & Willett, W. C. (1994). Prospective study of phobic anxiety and risk of coronary heart disease in men. Circulation, 89, 1992-1997. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.89.5.1992

Kawamura, N., Kim, Y., & Asukai, N. (2001). Suppression of cellular immunity in men with a past history of posttraumatic stress disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 484-486. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.484

Keller, A., Litzelman, K., Wisk, L. E., Maddox, T., Cheng, E. R., Creswell, P. D., & Witt, W. P. (2012). Does the perception that stress affects health matter? The association with health and mortality. Healthy Psychology, 31(5), 677-684. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026743.

Kemeny, M. E. (2003). The psychobiology of stress. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 124-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01246

Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Delmer, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E .E. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 593-602. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593

Khazan, I. (2013). The clinical handbook of biofeedback: A step-by-step guide for training and practice with mindfulness. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Kim, E. S., Hagan, K. A., Grodstein, F., DeMeo, D. L., De Vivo, I., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2016). Optimism and cause-specific mortality: A prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww182

Kivlinghan, K. T., Granger, D. A., & Booth, A. (2005). Gender differences in testosterone and cortisol response to competition. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30, 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.05.009

Kleiger, R. E., Miller, J. P., Bigger, J. T., & Moss, A. J. (1987). Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology, 59, 256-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(87)90795-8

Kuzmin, M. Y., & Konopak, I. A. (2016). Distinctive features of adolescent hardiness in families of different composition. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 9(3), 95–10. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2016.0306

Lacey, K., Zaharia, M. D., Griffiths, J., Ravindran, A. V., Merali, Z., & Anisman, H. (2000). A prospective study of neuroendocrine and immune alterations associated with the stress of an oral academic examination among graduate students. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 25, 339-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4530(99)00059-1

LaGreca, M., Skehan, L., & Hutchinson, D. (2022). The microbiome and neurotransmitter activity. The Journal of Science and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.37714/josam.v3i2.90

Lamprecht, F., & Sack, M. (2002). Posttraumatic stress disorder revisited. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 222-237. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200203000-00005

Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology, 30, 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03352.x

Lazarus, R. S. (1984). Puzzles in the study of daily hassles. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 7, 375-389. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00845271

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.

Lehrer. P. M. (2021). Psychophysiological and systems perspective. In P. M. Lehrer & R. L. Woolfolk (Eds.), Principles and practice of stress management (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.

Lin, P., Li, L., Wang, Y., Zhao, Z., Liu, G., Chen, W., & Tao, H. (2018). Type D personality, but not Type A behavior pattern, is associated with coronary plaque vulnerability. Psychol Health Med, 23(2), 216-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2017.1344254

Lynch, J., & Hsiao, E. (2023). Toward understanding links between the microbiome and neurotransmitters. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1524, 10 - 16. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14993

MacDougall, J. M., Dembroski, T. M., Dimsdale, J. E., & Hackett, T. P. (1985). Components of Type A, hostility, and anger-in: Further relationships to angiographic findings. Health Psychology, 4, 137-142. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.4.2.137

Maddi, S. R. (1987). Hardiness training at Illinois Bell Telephone. In J. P. Opatz (Ed.), Health promotion evaluation, pp. 101-1115. National Wellness Institute.

Maddi, S. R. (2017). Hardiness as a pathway to resilience under stress. In U. Kumar (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of psychosocial resilience (pp. 104–110). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

Maddi, S. R., Matthews, M. D., Kelly, D. R., Villarreal, B. J., Gundersen, K. K., & Savino, S. C. (2017). The continuing role of hardiness and grit on performance and retention in West Point cadets. Military Psychology, 29(5), 355–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000145

Maes, M., Hendricks, D., Van Gastel, A., Demedts, P., Wauters, A., Neels, H., . . . Scharp, S. (1997). Effects of psychological stress on serum immunoglobulin, complement and acute phase protein concentrations in normal volunteers. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 22, 397-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4530(97)00042-5

Maier, K. J., Waldstein, S. R., & Synowski, S. J. (2003). Relation of cognitive appraisal to cardiovascular reactivity, affect, and task engagement. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_05

Marin, T. J., Martin, T. M., Blackwell, E., Stetler, C., & Miller, G. E. (2007). Differentiating the impact of episodic and chronic stressors on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis regulation in young women. Health Psychology, 26(4), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.447

Markowitz, J. H., Matthews, K. A., Kannel, W. B., Cobb, J. L., & D'Agostino, R. B. (1993). Psychological predictors of hypertension in the Framingham study: Is there tension in hypertension? Journal of the American Medical Association, 270, 2439-2443. PMID: 8230620

Marsland, A. L., Bachen, E. A., Cohen, S., & Manuck, S. B. (2001). Stress, immunity, and susceptibility to infectious disease. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.). Handbook of health psychology (pp. 683-695). Erlbaum.

Mason, J. W. (1971). A reevaluation of the concept of "nonspecificity" in stress theory. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 8, 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(71)90028-8

Mason, J. W. (1975). A historical view of the stress field. Journal of Human Stress, 1(Pt. 2), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/0097840X.1975.9940399

Mason, J. W. (1975). A historical view of the stress field. Journal of Human Stress, 1(Pt. 2), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/0097840X.1975.9940399

Maver, J., Strucl, M., & Accetto, R. (2004). Autonomic nervous system activity in normotensive subjects with a family history of hypertension. Clinical Autonomic Research: Official Journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 14(6), 369-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-004-0185-z

McAuley, E., Jerome, G. J., Marquez, D. X., Elavsky, S., & Blissmer, B. (2003). Exercise self-efficacy in older adults: Social, affective, and behavioral influences. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2501_01

McCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T., Larson, D. S., Koenig, H. G., & Thoresen, C. (2000). Religious involvement and mortality: A meta-analytic review. Health Psychology, 19, 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.19.3.211

McEwen, B. S. (2000). Allostasis and allostatic load: Implications for neuropsychopharmacology. Neuropsychopharmacology, 22, 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05331.x

McEwen, B. S. (2002). The end of stress as we know it. Joseph Henry Press.

McEwen, B. S. (2005). Stressed or stressed out: What is the difference? Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 30, 315–318. PMID: 16151535

McEwen, B. S., & Gianaros, P. J. (2010). Central role of the brain in stress and adaptation: Links to socioeconomic status, health, and disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186, 190–222.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05331.x

McEwen, B. S. & Seeman, T. (1999). Protective and damaging effects of mediators of stress: Elaborating and testing the concepts of allostasis and allostatic load. In Adler, N. E., Marmot, M., McEwen, B. S. & Stewart, J. (Eds.). Socioeconomic Status and Health in Industrial Nations: Social, Psychological and Biological Pathways. Ann NY Acad Sci, 896.

McEwen, B. S. & Seeman, T. (2003). Stress and affect: Applicability of the concepts of allostasis and allostatic load. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.). Handbook of affective sciences. Oxford University Press.

McEwen, B. S., & Stellar, E. (1993). Stress and the individual: Mechanisms leading to disease. Archives of Internal Medicine, 153, 2093-2101. PMID: 8379800

McGonagle, K. A., & Kessler, R. C. (1990). Chronic stress, acute stress, and depressive symptoms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 681-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931237

McVicar, A., Ravalier, J. M., & Greenwood, C. (2014). Biology of stress revisited: Intracellular mechanisms and the conceptualization of stress. Stress and Health, 30(4), 272–279.

Menard, C., Pfau, M. L., Hodes, G. E., & Russo, S. J. (2017). Immune and neuroendocrine mechanisms of stress vulnerability and resilience. Neuropsychopharmacology, 42(1), 62–80.

Meyer, T., Hussein, S., Lange, H. W., & Hermann-Lingen, C. (2014). Type D personality is unrelated to major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease treated by intracoronary stenting. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 48(2), 156-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9590-2

Moksnes, U. K., & Espnes, G. A. (2016). Stress: Concepts, models, and measures. In M. E. Alvarenga, & D. Byrne (Eds.). Handbook of psychocardiology. Springer Singapore.

Moore, L. J., Vine, S. J., Wilson, M. R., & Freeman, P. (2012). The effect of challenge and threat states on performance: An examination of potential mechanisms. Psychophysiology, 49(10), 1417–1425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01449.x

Murphy, J. K., Stoney, C. M., Alpert, B. S., & Walker, S. S. (1995). Gender and ethnicity in children's cardiovascular reactivity: 7 years of study. Health Psychology, 14, 48-55. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.14.1.48

Ng, D. M., & Jefferey, R. W. (2003). Relationships between perceived stress and health behaviors in a sample of working adults. Health Psychology, 22, 638-642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.22.6.638

Nolan, J., Flapan, A. D., Capewell, S., MacDonald, T. M., Neilson, J. M., & Ewing, D. J. (1992). Decreased cardiac parasympathetic activity in chronic heart failure and its relation to left ventricular function. Br Heart J, 67(6), 482-485. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.67.6.482.

O'Dowd, T. C. (1987). To burn out or to rust out in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract, 37(300), 290-291. PMID: 3449629

Parkash, V., Archana, & Kumar, U. (2017). Role of genetics and temperament in resilience. In U. Kumar (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of psychosocial resilience (pp. 75–87). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

Perkins, K. A., Dubbert, P. M., Martin, J. E., Faulstich, M. E., & Harris, J. K. (1986). Cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress in aerobically trained versus untrained mild hypertensives and normotensives. Health Psychology, 5, 407-421. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.5.4.407

Pitts, B. L., Safer, M. A., Russell, D. W., & Castro-Chapman, P. L. (2016). Effects of hardiness and years of military service on post-traumatic stress symptoms in U.S. Army medics. Military Psychology, 28(4), 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000106

Poulin, M. J., Brown, S. L., Dillard, A. J., & Smith, D. M. (2013). Giving to others and the association between stress and mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 103(9), 1649-1655. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300876.

Pratt, L. A., Ford, D. E., Crum, R. M., Armenian, H. K., Gallo, J. J., & Eaton, W. W. (1996). Depression, psychotropic medication, and risk of myocardial infarction. Prospective data from the Baltimore ECA follow-up. Circulation, 94(12), 3123-3129. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.94.12.3123

Raby, K. L. (2016). Early interpersonal antecedents of physiological reactivity in adult romantic relationships. Dissertation Abstracts International, 76(11-B(E)).

Rahe, R. H., & Arthur, R. J. (1978). Life change and illness studies: Past history and future directions. Journal of Human Stress, 4, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0097840X.1978.9934972

Ray, C., Jefferies, S., & Weir, W. R. (1995). Life-events and the course of chronic fatigue syndrome. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 68, 323-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1995.tb01839.x

Roach, D., Wilson, W., Ritchie, D., & Sheldon, R. (2004). Dissection of long-range heart rate variability: Controlled induction of prognostic measures by activity in the laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol, 43(12), 2271-2277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.050

Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (1979). A comparison of life-event-weighting schemes: Change, undesirability, and effect-proportional indices. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 20, 166-177. PMID: 479528

Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 805-819. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.76.5.805

Saey, T. H. (2016). Body's bacteria don't outnumber human cells so much after all: New calculations suggest roughly equal populations, not 10-to-1 ratio. Science News. Retrieved from https://www.sciencenews.org

Sarafino, E. P., Smith, T. W., King, D. B., & DeLongis, A. (2020). Health psychology: Biopsychosocial interactions (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Schächtle, M. A., & Rosshart, S. P. (2021). The microbiota-gut-brain axis in health and disease and its iImplications for translational research. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 15, 698172. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2021.698172

Schell, L. M., & Denham, M. (2003). Environmental pollution in urban environments and human biology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093218

Schneider, J. (1984). Stress, loss, and grief: Understanding their origins and growth potential. University Park Press.

Schwartz, G. E. (1982). Testing the biopsychosocial model: The ultimate challenge facing behavioral medicine? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 1040-1053. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.50.6.1040

Searle, A., & Bennett, P. (2001). Psychological factors and inflammatory bowel disease: A review of a decade of literature. Psychology and Health Medicine, 6, 121-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500120035382

Seeman, T. E., Singer, B. H., Rowe, J. W., Horwitz, R. I., & McEwen, B. S. (1997). Price of adaptation—allostatic load and its health consequences. Archives of Internal Medicine, 157, 2259-2268. PMID: 9343003

Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. McGraw-Hill.

Selye, H. (1974). Stress without distress. Lippincott.

Selye, H. (1976). Stress in health and disease. Butterworth.

Sender, R., Fuchs, S., & Milo, R. (2016), Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. BioRxiv. Posted online January 6, 2016.

Serido, J., Almeida, D. M., & Wethington, E. (2004). Chronic stressors and daily hassles: Unique and interactive relationships with psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650404500102

Shaffer, F., & Manion, M. (2016). Immune Function. In G. Tan, F. Shaffer, R. R. Lyle, & I. Teo (Eds.). Evidence-based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback (3rd ed.). Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.

Shaffer, F., McCraty, R., & Zerr, C. L. (2014). A healthy heart is not a metronome: An integrative review of the heart’s anatomy and heart rate variability. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01040

Shaffer, F., Meehan, Z. M., & Zerr, C. L. (2020). A critical review of ultra-short-term heart rate variability norms research. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 594880. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.594880

Silva, R. P., Alpert, M., Munoz, D. M., Singh, S., Matzner, F., & Dummit, S. (2000). Stress and vulnerability to posttraumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents. Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1229-1235. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1229

Smith, T. W., Glazer, K., Ruiz, M., & Gallo, L. C. (2004). Hostility, anger, aggressiveness, and coronary heart disease: An interpersonal perspective on personality, emotion, and health. Journal of Personality, 72(6), 1217-1270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00296.x

Sonstroem, R. J. (1997). Physical activity and self-esteem. In W. P. Morgan (Ed.), Physical activity and mental health (pp. 127-143). Taylor & Francis.

Stein, M. B., Walker, J. R., & Forde, D. R. (2000). Gender differences in susceptibility to posttraumatic stress disorder. Behavior Research and Therapy, 38, 619-628. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00098-4

Stoppelbein, L., McRae, E., & Greening, L. (2017). A longitudinal study of hardiness as a buffer for posttraumatic stress symptoms in mothers of children with cancer. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology, 5(2), 149–160.

Strandwitz, P. (2018). Neurotransmitter modulation by the gut microbiota. Brain Research, 1693, 128-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2018.03.015

Surrey Place-Staff (2021). What is intersectionality and white privilege? Retrieved from https://www.surreyplace.ca/what-is-intersectionality-and-white-privilege/ on 12/20/2021.

Sutton, S. K., & Davidson, R. J. (1997). Prefrontal brain asymmetry: A biological substrate of the behavioral approach and inhibition systems. Psychological Science, 8, 204-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00413.x

Tamres, L. K., Janicki, D., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(1), 2–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_1

Tan, T., Khoo, B., Mills, E. G., Phylactou, B. P. Eng, P. C., Thurston, B. M., Meeran, K., Prevost, A. T., Comninos, A. N., Abbara, A., & Dhillo, W. S. (2020). Association between high serum total cortisol concentrations and mortality from COVID-19. Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, 8(8), 659–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30216-3

Taylor, S. E. (2006). Tend and befriend: Biobehavioral bases of affiliation under stress. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00451.x

Taylor, S. E. (2021). Health psychology (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Taylor, S. E., Gonzaga, G., Klein, L. C., Hu, P., Greendale, G. A., & Seeman, T. E. (2006). Relation of oxytocin to psychological and biological stress responses in women. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68, 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000203242.95990.74

Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411-429. https://doi.org10.1037/0033-295x.107.3.411

Taylor, S. E., Saphire-Bernstein, S., & Seeman, T. E. (2010). Are plasma oxytocin in women and plasma vasopressin in men biomarkers of distressed pair-bond relationships? Psychological Science, 21, 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609356507

Theoharides, T. C., Cholevas, C., Polyzoidis, K., & Politis, A. (2021). Biofactors, 47(2), 232-241. https://doi.org/0.1002/biof.1726

Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 53-67. PMID: 11195891

Turner, R. J., & Avison, W. R. (1992). Innovations in the measurement of life stress: Crisis theory and the significance of event resolution. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33, 36-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136856

Turner, R. J., & Avison, W. R. (2003). Status variations in stress exposure: Implications for the interpretation of research on race, socioeconomic status, and gender. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 488-505. PMID: 15038145

Wagner, N., Mills-Koonce, R., Willoughby, M., Propper, C., Rehder, P., & Gueron-Sela, N. (2017). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia and heart period in infancy as correlates of later oppositional defiant and callous–unemotional behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(1), 12

Wiley, J. F., Gruenewald, T. L., Karlamangla, A. S., & Seeman, T. E. (2016). Modeling multisystem physiological dysregulation. Psychosom Med, 78(3), 290-301. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000288

Williams, J. E., Paton, C. C., Siegler, J. C., et al. (2000). Anger proneness predicts coronary heart disease risk: Prospective analysis from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Circulation, 101, 2034-2039. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.17.2034

Woolfolk, R. L., Lehrer, P. M., & Allen, L. A. (2007). Conceptual issues underlying stress management. In P. M. Lehrer, R. L. Woolfolk, & W. E. Sime (Eds.). Principles and practice of stress management (3rd ed.). The Guildford Press.  

Yan, L. L., Liu, K., Matthews, K. A., Daviglus, M. L., Ferguson, T. F., & Kiefe, C. I. (2003). Psychosocial factors and risk of hypertension: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. JAMA, 290(16), 2138-2148. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.16.213

Yasmin, F., Saxena, K., McEwen, B. S., & Chattarji, S. (2016). The delayed strengthening of synaptic connectivity in the amygdala depends on NMDA receptor activation during acute stress. Physiol Rep, 4(20), pii: e13002. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13002

Zeer, E. F., Yugova, E. A., Karpova, N. P., & Trubetskaya, O. V. (2016). Psychological predictors of human hardiness formation. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 7035–7044.